Category Archives: Bible

The myth of the Jewish people

By Jamal Kanj

Founding myths of IsraelThe Invention of the Jewish People is a book written by Shlomo Sand, an Israeli professor of history at the University of Tel Aviv.

The author wasn’t probing a belief system but Zionist fabrications of a spurious common lineage for people of the Jewish faith.

Sand argues that the idea of Jews having a common ethnic identity is implausible because, as with Christianity and Islam, Judaism was originally a “proselytising religion”.

The notion of Judaism as a “race”, rather than a religion of various races, is without foundation.
The results of a recently published study by Israeli-American geneticist Dr Eran Elhaik at John Hopkins University have scientifically and genetically validated Sand’s research.

Modern political Zionism, which otherwise rejects the Christian Bible, adopted the untested story of “Jewish exile” to establish a mythical linkage between European Jews and the Middle East.

The idea of a “nation race” was progressively developed and reinforced over centuries among segregated Jewish communities in Europe.

With the rise of German nationalism in the 19th century, Jewish historian Heinrich Graetz “retrospectively” crafted a discrete identity for the ghettoized people –  mapping their origin to an old kingdom and wandering exiles.

The exiles tales transpired from a Christian myth of “divine punishment” imposed on Jews for rejecting the new religion.

The parable is likely to have originated from the Old Testament story of Jews wandering the desert for disobeying God and worshipping a golden calf.

Christians propagated the concept of exile to lure “disobeying” Jews to the new religion, becoming their saviour from another eternal banishment.

Modern political Zionism, which otherwise rejects the Christian Bible, adopted the untested story of “Jewish exile” to establish a mythical linkage between European Jews and the Middle East.

But Jewish history tells us that the Romans did not expel the original Jews from Palestine when they crushed the Simon bar Kokhba revolt in 136 AD but instead barred them only from city of Jerusalem – and even then they were allowed to visit it during Tisha B’Av, the annual fasting day on the ninth day of the month of Av in the Hebrew calendar.

Under Christianity and during the Roman Empire a large number of native Jews converted to Christianity and, with the advent of Islam, most adopted the new religion and assimilated under the new power.
 

Followers of the first monotheistic religion continued to have a presence in Palestine hundreds of years after the waning of the Roman Empire.

The last recorded history of an autonomous Jewish entity was under the tutelage of the Persian Empire in 614 AD, before it was dismantled by Byzantine forces in 625 AD.

A little over 10 years later Palestine was conquered by the Muslims and became part of the new Arab and Muslim community.

Under Christianity and during the Roman Empire a large number of native Jews converted to Christianity and, with the advent of Islam, most adopted the new religion and assimilated under the new power.

In addition to the descendants of the Canaanites, the original denizens before patriarch Abraham’s arrival from Mesopotamia, Sand concludes that today’s Muslim and Christian Palestinians are actually the true progenies of the original Jews.

So if there was no exile, where did European Jews come from?

Sand suggested that most of today’s Jews did not originate from the Middle East.

He argues that the European (Ashkenazi) Jewish ancestry can be traced back to the Caucasus region.

Founded on a mélange of myths and manufactured historical tales, Israel has failed the archaeological test of time and is now exposed by DNA science.
 

In the 8th century, the Khazars’ subjects and subordinate tribes experienced the largest religious conversion in the history of Judaism.

The recent study by John Hopkins geneticist Dr Elhaik confirms that the common genome structure of the European Jew gravitated towards an origin in old Khazaria.

“The majority of Jews do not have Middle Eastern genetic component,” he told Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

Founded on a mélange of myths and manufactured historical tales, Israel has failed the archaeological test of time and is now exposed by DNA science.

Today’s genetics prove unequivocally that in 1948 “the children of the original Jews” were replaced by 8th century converts with no roots in the Middle East.


A version of this article was first published in the Gulf Daily News. The version here is published by permission of Jamal Kanj
 

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

A Review of ‘The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit’ by E. Michael Jones




The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit
and its Impact on World History
By E. Michael Jones 

Reviewed by Richard Edmondson

Recently while visiting the blog Wake Up From Your Slumber I came across the interview with E. Michael Jones that you can hear in the four videos embedded below. I had actually read Jones’ book, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History, a year or two back and had for a long time now been intending to post something on it. Problem is where do you begin? The book is 1200 pages long and covers some 2000 years of history. How do you condense all that down to a single blog post? But after listening to the interview below, I finally decided to give it a whirl.
Of course it always helps to know where people are coming from, so I’ll mention right off the bat that Jones is a Roman Catholic, and one of the focuses of his book, perhaps the main one, is the gradual erosion, over a number of centuries, of the Church’s power and authority in Europe, a process in which Jews, as the author shows, played very key and very active roles every step of the way (along with the help of willing Christians), and the eventual displacement of that authority by the rising tide of Jewish power. This is an extremely important area of study because for many, many centuries it was the Catholic Church that kept Jewish power in check. Today the Church no longer plays that role, leaving a void that Islam, fortunately, has stepped in to fill, and while Islam has not been able, at least thus far, to thoroughly check Jewish power as successfully as Christianity once did, it nonetheless stands as one of the only major remaining obstacles to total global domination by Jewish Zionists, which is why Christians and Muslims, now more than ever, need to unite (but I’m getting a bit off topic here).
Initially upon picking up Jones’ book, it was hard for me to wrap my mind around the word “revolutionary” insofar as his use of the term. Having grown up in the sixties, I was accustomed to thinking of revolutionaries as the good guys (think Che Guevara, etc.), and the word has always had, for me, a positive, rather than negative, connotation. But what Jones refers to is that process I described in the previous paragraph, i.e. of overthrowing the power of the Catholic Church and replacing it with Jewish power. Or, to look at it another way (since Jones is a Catholic), the overthrow of God. That’s of course one that secular-minded Westerners would probably choke on their food laughing over, but consider the term Moharebeh. A concept found in Islamic law, the word means “waging war against God.” The fact that no comparable word exists in the English language (or even a comparable idea of such) is probably testimony to the extent of the collapse of the church’s moral authority and the widespread feelings of alienation and powerlessness that permeate Western society today. No such collapse has occurred in the Muslim world, though of course the Zionists are doing their damnedest to engineer it—in Libya, Syria, Iran, and elsewhere.
So in a sense—from Jones’ standpoint, and certainly this is true in the West—the “revolution” has already occurred, and at this point what we are waging—that is to say those of us who oppose Israel and seek to restrain the power of Jewish lobbies in our respective countries—is a counterrevolution. It’s good to understand this, and to make this distinction, when considering the areas into which Jones ventures in this book.
The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit has a total of 32 chapters, but in this review, I’ll focus mainly on three—the third chapter, entitled “Rome Discovers the Talmud”; Chapter number 7, “Reuchlin vs. Pfefferkorn”; and the 24th chapter, “The Second Vatican Council Begins.” Chapter 24, along with a subsequent related chapter, covers the Church’s passage of Nostra Aetate, the 1965 document that resulted in a capitulation to Jewish power and ushered in the modern era of “interfaith dialogue”—efforts that have led to little other than Christians being spat upon in Israel and their faith ridiculed in American media.
Rome Discovers the Talmud
Believe it or not, the Church first became acquainted with the contents of the Talmud way back in the year 1236. Before this, the collection of rabbinical writings was virtually unknown among Christians. Its discovery came about when a Jew named Nicholas Donin converted to Christianity and went public with what it contained. As you may imagine, Church leaders were not too thrilled. The church at this time had long operated under Sicut Judaeis non, a policy that had been articulated by Pope Gregory the Great, under which Jews were not to be harmed—but at the same time were to be given no positions of influence. The pope in power at the time Donin made his disclosures was Gregory IX. According to Jones:
He was shocked by what he discovered, but he did not abrogate Sicut Judaeis non and its prohibition against harming the Jew. What changed was his understanding of what the Jews believed and how they acted on those beliefs.

On June 9, 1239, Pope Gregory responded to Donin’s 35 petitions by dispatching him with a letter to William of Auvergne, bishop of Paris. His letter substantiates the changed perception of Jews after discovery of the Talmud. The Jews, Gregory wrote, “so we have heard, are not content with the Old Law which God gave to Moses in writing: they even ignore it completely and affirm that God gave another Law which is called ‘Talmud,’ that is ‘Teaching,’ handed down to Moses orally…In this is contained matter so abusive and so unspeakable that it arouses shame in those who mention it and horror in those who hear it.” The offenses are so great that Gregory uses the word “crime” to describe them. He also claims the Talmud is “the chief cause that holds the Jews obstinate in their perfidy.” He ordered “on the first Saturday of Lent to come, in the morning which the Jews are gathered in the synagogues, you shall, by our order seize all the books of the Jews who live in your districts and have those books carefully guarded in the possession of the Dominican and Franciscan friars.” If the friars found the books offensive, they were to burn them.

Eventually a commission was convened to study the books, its members ultimately finding them “full of innumerable errors, abuses, blasphemies and wickedness.” The panel concluded that the books “cannot be tolerated in the name of God without injury to the Christian faith.” Blasphemies against Christ in the Talmud, along with its injunctions about defrauding unsuspecting goyim, threatened “the conditions under which Jews were tolerated,” as Jones notes, and also “called for rethinking the whole social compact.” The debate raged for several years until finally, in June of 1240, a public forum, under royal auspices, was held, featuring Donin in a debate with a Rabbi Yehiel ben Joseph:
One Jewish commentator claims “the entire event epitomized the declining status of Jews in that century and their transformation in Christian minds into little more than embodiments of blasphemous doctrine.” The rabbi was dumbfounded that he had to defend Jewish esoteric writings in a hostile environment. Nothing like this had ever happened before. Rabbi Yehiel, lacking precedent for conducting a disputation of this sort, didn’t know how to respond. When asked whether it were true that the Talmud claimed “Jesus was condemned to an eternity in hell, immersed in ‘boiling excrement’” and Mary, his mother, was a whore, the Rabbi could only respond, yes, those passages were in the Talmud but they did not refer to “that” Jesus or “that” Mary. “Not every Louis born in France is the king of France,” Yehiel maintained, giving new meaning to the term “chutzpah.” “Has it not happened,” he continued, “that two men were born in the same city, had the same name, and died in the same manner? There are many such cases.” One Jewish historian referred to Rabbi Yehiel’s denial as the birth of Jewish humor. A Christian account of the debate, however, failed to see the humor in his statement, “Concerning this Jesus, he confessed that he was born out of adultery and that he is punished in hell in boiling excrement and that he lived at the time of Titus.” But Rabbi Yehiel said, “this Jesus is different from our Jesus. However, he is unable to say who he was, whence it is clear that he lied.”

Having exploded his own credibility, Yehiel could do little to refute Donin’s claim that the Talmud sanctioned criminal behavior, including “murder, theft, and religious intolerance.” The Talmud also “included strictures against trusting Gentiles, honoring them or even returning a lost piece of property to them.”

The result of the debate was a public burning of the Talmud in Paris, and as Jones remarks, “The Jewish religion was now clearly seen not as biblical Judaism, but rather as a heretical deviation from the Old Testament.” This is an extremely important point, because by 1962 and the convening of the Second Vatican Council, the contents of the Talmud would substantially disappear down the memory hole and Jews once again would be seen as merely carrying on the tradition of biblical Judaism.
Following the discovery of the Talmud, the Church made Jewish conversions a top priority, yet at the same time, Jews came under closer scrutiny by the Inquisition. In terms of public opinion, “they became revolutionaries, outlaws, and subversives, and by the end of the 13th century, they were universally recognized as such,” says Jones. “The expulsions that followed were the official recognition of status that had its roots in the discovery of the Talmud.” Yet in spite of this, “the Church never changed its position that no one had the right to harm the Jew,” and when Jews came under attack by angry mobs, “the popes were their first defenders.” In fact, the protection they enjoyed from the popes was often viewed critically by kings and princes, who regarded the Jews as subversives. And while there was a “crescendo of conversions,” a number of expulsions also took place. Jews were expelled from Cologne in 1424, from Speyer in 1435, from Mainz in 1438, and finally, in 1492, came the granddaddy of them all—the expulsion of the Jews from Spain by the Catholic monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella.
Reuchlin vs. Pfefferkorn
Some 270 years after Nicholas Donin, history basically repeated itself when yet another Jew, Josef Pfefferkorn, converted to Christianity and—once again—made public disclosures about the Talmud. By this time, however, as Jones relates, “times had changed” in Europe. The Reformation was in its early years, the Hussite Rebellion had occurred in Bohemia, and cracks had begun to appear in the edifice of Church authority. Furthermore, a process of “Judaizing” of the Christian faith was underway in some areas. As described by the author, “The temptation to look for heaven on earth was known as Judaizing, which took messianic inspiration from a distorted interpretation of the Old Testament.” And Christian “reformers” working to undermine Church authority—often aided and abetted by Jews (as was the case in the Hussite revolt)—saw themselves as modern embodiments of the Jews of the Old Testament. As may be expected, millennialism played a major role in their thinking (not unlike Christian Zionists of today). Heinrich Graetz, a Jewish historian quoted by Jones, puts it this way: “Whenever a party in Christendom opposes itself to the ruling church, it assumes a tinge of the Old Testament, not to say Jewish spirit.” The result being, of course, a de-emphasis on the teachings of Christ in favor of the violence and bloodshed of the Old Testament—certainly the case in the matter of the Hussite Rebellion of the early 15th century, as Jones explains:
Inspired by Israelite genocide in the Old Testament, the Hussite warriors of God earned a reputation for cruelty…Newman claims the Hussites had “personal associations with individual Jews and Jewish communities in their country.” He also claims “Jewish groups participated[ed] actively and publicly in the rise and spread of the [Hussite] movement. According to Newman, Jewish support of heretical movements, especially when they threatened to spill over into political revolutions, “run like dark threads through the history of nearly every movement of reform in European Christendom.”
This pattern, i.e. of Jews lending their support to the Christian Judaizers, was to continue over the next few centuries, and as Jones notes, “before long the trajectory was predictable”—the Judaizers would discard the teachings of Jesus in favor of the Old Testament, rising up against the established Church and urging “reform,” taking up the sword in an effort to “bring about heaven on earth.” And every step of the way the Jews were essentially playing them like a violin. Does any of this sound familiar?
Living much of his life in Cologne, Pfefferkorn (1469-1523) was a prolific writer who produced a number of books and pamphlets on Judaism, or what we might today call “Jewish identity.” Like Donin, he “knew Judaism from the inside out,” Jones tells us. In one pamphlet, Ich bin ain Buchlinn der Juden veindt ist mein namen, or The Enemy of the Jews (1509) he discussed the blasphemies against Jesus, Mary and the apostles, as well as the curses against Christians that Jews would incorporate into their daily prayers:
The Jews, said Pfefferkorn, utter “various insults and shameless words…every day against God, Mary, his most worthy mother, and the whole heavenly host.” The Jews call Jesus “mamser ben hanido,” which is to say, “one born from an unclean union.” Although Pfefferkorn doesn’t say so, “mamser” is traditionally translated “bastard.” The Jews are similarly vehement in denouncing Christ’s mother, callher her a “sono,” which Pfefferkorn translates as “a notorious sinner.” Again Pfefferkorn is discrete; the word means “whore.” Pfefferkorn says the Jews call Christian churches “mosschoff” or “beskisse,” that is [latrines or] shithouses.” Additionally, the Jews “hate the sign of the holy cross and find it quite unbearable. If they see pieces of wood or straw on the ground that are by chance arranged roughly in the shape of a cross, they push it apart with their feet that they may no longer have to look at it.” If a Jew “knowingly crosses a churchyard or listens to an organ,” he “believes that his prayers will not be heard by God for 30 days.”
Pfefferkorn converted to Christianity in 1504, along with his wife and child (whereupon he changed his first name from Josef to Johannes), and in one of his earliest writings, Der Juden Spiegel, or Mirror of the Jews, he attacked usury, confessing that prior to his conversion he had earned money from the practice. “I was born in the Jewish faith and am now, by the grace of God, a Christian,” he wrote. “If I continued to associate with Jews and continued to take usury, what would you say other than that I was in serious sin and that I never really became a Christian, and everyone would condemn me by saying that the blood and suffering of Christ had been lost on me.”
As may be expected, Pfefferkorn came under heavy attack from the Jews of his day. He was accused of criminal activity, and especially noteworthy were the charges found in a document that has been traced to a group of Jews in Regensburg: “Among its milder statements was the claim he (Pfefferkorn)was an illiterate butcher,” remarks Jones. “He was neither illiterate nor was he a butcher, an occupation morally less reprehensible than that of moneylender.”
But it wasn’t only the Jews of Pfefferkorn’s own day. Jones quotes a number of Jewish historians whose works have provided accounts of the time, among these the aforementioned Graetz—a 19th century Jew who became one of the first scholars of the modern era to write a compendious history of the Jewish people:
In his groundbreaking History of the Jews, Heinrich Graetz recites the slanders (against Pfefferkorn) faithfully and uncritically and adds a few of his own, calling Pfefferkorn “an ignorant, thoroughly vile creature,” as well as “the scum of the Jewish people,” and a “noisome insect” who was a tool of the “ignorant and fanatical Dominicans” of Cologne, a city known to be “an owls’ nest of light-shunning swaggerers, who endeavored to obscure the dawn of a bright day with the dark clouds of superstition hostile to knowledge.”
The last point is particularly important to keep in mind, for in those years of the early 16th century, “a new day of enlightened tolerance was about to dawn,” and Pfefferkorn’s Jewish contemporaries were quick to take advantage of it in their organized attacks upon him. The Hermetic texts, lost to Western culture during the Middle Ages, had been re-discovered, translated, and published—significant events, for with their appeals to alchemy and magic, the impact this corpus of writings had upon Renaissance thought and culture was considerable. Europe was about to veer in a new direction and the Church was considered an obstacle.
In part two of his Juden veindt, Pfefferkorn included a section entitled “How the Jews Ruin Land and People,” in which he described the process of usury—how it works and how it is used to impoverish the poor. “Thus the poor Christian, when he has nothing further to pawn, must run away and live out his life in poverty, which happens often and many times.” From there Pfefferkorn went on, in part three, to talk about Jews using their wealth to bribe officials as well as to “cause Christians to commit great sins”—sins in the course of which many Christians, both learned and unlearned, are “led astray” and come “to doubt their faith, as I have shown in other books of mine.”
All of this finally won the ear of the Emperor Maxmillian I, who in 1509 authorized this “anti-Semitic” troublemaker (as Pfefferkorn would no doubt be referred today) to travel throughout “the German empire” for purpose of examining Jewish writings and to “destroy all whose contents were hostile to the Bible and the Christian faith.” Subsequently, however, the emperor, bowing to Jewish pressure and bribery, reversed himself, and instead of having the books destroyed, appointed a commission to study them. Pfefferkorn won a seat on the commission, but luckily for the Jews, the panel was to also to hear testimony from Johannes Reuchlin, a man who, though ironically a Gentile, was to become their valiant ally and Pfefferkorn’s chief detractor.
Though Reuchlin is described by Jones as a “Judaizer,” he also was a highly educated man who had written a number of books, and like many of his time he was quite enamored of magic. Esteemed as a one of the great intellects of Europe, Reuchlin was a particularly avid proponent of the Jewish Caballah, and in 1506 he published De Rudiments Hebraicis, the first Hebrew grammar ever written by a non-Jew. Little wonder, then, the Jews celebrated his involvement with the commission.
Reuchlin claimed the Caballah demonstrated the validity of the Christian faith and also corresponded to the esoteric wisdom of Orpheus, Pythagoras, and Zoroaster. By locating the magical power of his system in the Hebrew language, Reuchlin hoped to evade the dichotomy the Church, following the classical tradition, had established. According to that dichotomy, a man either asked for power over nature, in which case his action was known as prayer and dependent on the permissive will of the deity; or he forced the issue by invoking evil spirits. Caballah seemed to indicate another possibility. The possibility of a middle ground between science and prayer based on the magical effects of angelic names in Hebrew seemed theologically unlikely, but that is the course Reuchlin pursued, hoping to evade the censure of those who claimed he was involved in black magic.
After skimming through the Jewish books that had been seized (it appears he never actually read all of them), Reuchlin recommended only two for destruction—Nizzachon and Toledoth Jeschu—meaning he did not find the Talmud objectionable. Pronouncing the latter “a work which is difficult to understand,” he acknowledged there were many strange ideas found therein, but held that this did not justify suppressing it. “If the Talmud were deserving of such condemnation, our ancestors of many hundred years ago, whose zeal for Christianity was much greater than ours, would have burnt it,” he assured. As for the two works which did merit extirpation in his view, Reuchlin insisted they had no standing in the Jewish community and that “even the Jews themselves regard them as apocryphal.”
But what of Jewish attitudes toward non-Jews? Reuchlin expressed the view that “whether they are inimically disposed toward us in their hearts, only God can say.” As gracious and cordial as that sounded, for the Caballah, of course, Reuchlin had nothing but highest praise, calling it “the most secret speech and words of God,” and asserting that “Jewish commentaries should not and cannot be abandoned by the Christian church, for they keep the special characteristics of the Hebrew language before our eyes.” Furthermore, he asserted that “the Bible cannot be interpreted without them.”
Thus having given the Jews a substantially clean bill of health, Reuchlin then turned his attention on their chief nemesis, insisting that Pfefferkorn’s attacks upon the Talmud were most likely motivated “for private reasons.”
In his report, Reuchlin denounced Pfefferkorn’s writings as the work of an ignorant hatemonger, thus establishing the debate’s parameters: the refined man of letters vs. the ignorant “tauf jud,” a racist slur picked up by Reuchlin’s supporters, including Erasmus of Rotterdam. Pfefferkorn called Reuchlin a Judaizer, a term then in the process of losing its opprobrium among educated humanists.
Says Jones, the debate in fact came down to a “Humanist vs. Scholastic mode,” with Pfefferkorn being staunchly defended by the Dominicans and the theology faculties at the Universities of Cologne and Louvain. In fact, every scholar appointed to the Commission, with the exception of Reuchlin himself, supported Pfefferkorn. But it was all to no avail. In the end, the Emperor decided matters in favor of the Jews.
As a result of Reuchlin’s recommendation, the emperor did not renew the mandate to confiscate the Jewish books. Reuchlin had killed the project, and Pfefferkorn was furious. Pfefferkorn correctly claimed “the Jews bribed Christians in high places…and they filled the ears of the good Emperor with false advice, so that His imperial Majesty gave orders to restore the books to the Jews”…

Having one of the most distinguished Christian scholars in Europe defend the Talmud left Jews rubbing their eyes in amazement. The Jews rushed out to buy Reuchlin’s book, and using their commercial connections, made it an instant bestseller, perhaps the first in history.

The incident paved the way for further changes in Europe, some of them huge, for as Jones notes, Reuchlin had gathered support from “virtually the entire Humanist community”—a group that included Martin Luther and Ulrich von Hutten.
The loser, of course, was the authority of the Catholic Church.
The Second Vatican Council
In June of 1960, a French Jew by the name of Jules Isaac journeyed to Rome where he managed to win an audience with Pope John XXIII. Isaac was an historian, had served as inspector general of France’s public schools, and had written two books on Catholic attitudes toward Jews, Jesus et Israel and Genese de l’Antisemitisme, in which he argued that 1) the Catholic Church had preached an anti-Semitism for 2000 years which, 2) found its ultimate expression in the mass murder of Jews in World War II. “Father Paul De Mann from Paris and Father Gregory Baum, a Jewish convert from Canada, spread his thesis in Catholic circles,” Jones writes. “Baum called Jesus et Israel ‘a moving account of the love which Jesus had for his people, the Jews, and of the contempt which the Christians, later, harbored for them.’”
Pope John’s predecessor, Pope Pius XII, had led the church through the war years, having been nuncio to Germany during the rise of National Socialism, elevated finally to the papacy in 1939. As Jones puts it, Pius “knew the rise of Hitler in Bavaria in 1923 was predicated on the excesses of Jewish Bolshevism there and not on readings of the sermons of St. John Chrysostom or the Gospel of St. John.” But with the death of Pius in 1958, Isaac sensed a “new spirit” blowing through the Vatican and a “window of opportunity for his ideas.” Indeed there was, and attacks upon Pius, not surprisingly, ended up becoming one of the chief strategies employed by Jews in pushing their resolution through the Council.
The story of Vatican II is a complex one, but Jones tells it skillfully and in detail. Initially, at any rate, the Council’s principle aim was not addressing the issue of anti-Semitism. Rather, the key word was aggiornamento, meaning to bring the church “up to date” in its relationship with the modern world. The preliminary documents in fact were already being drawn prior to Isaac’s audience with the pope, and for the most part their objective was not so much to “baptize the Enlightenment,” as Jones puts it, but to “make Catholics aware of a threat to faith and morals coming from the West, in particular, the United States, more particularly, Hollywood.” For some in the Church, represented particularly perhaps by Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani, American films were “a vehicle for American mores,” which in turn were “undermining the traditional way of life” in predominantly Catholic countries. “Modern life, without doubt, multiplies invitations to evil by such distractions as beauty contests, spectacles, billboards, songs, illustrated magazines, beaches, places of vacation, promiscuity, and certain forms of sport,” one of the early documents asserted. Condemning “the cult of movie stars, naturalism, the so-called sexual education, pansexualism, and certain injurious aspects of psychoanalysis,” the document warned that if the Church lost its hold on sexual morals, it would lose control of “the ordinary way of sanctification for the majority of the human race.” Jones comments:
It didn’t take a genius to know who in America was prominent in supporting “the cult of movie stars, pansexualism and psychoanalysis.” It was the Jews.
Yet at the same time, Isaac found himself amiably received by Pope John. Their meeting took place June 13, 1960, with the pope taking the initiative by “discoursing on his devotion to the Old Testament,” and Isaac responding that such sentiments “kindled great hopes in the people of the Old Testament.” Isaac further told the pope the time had come to fulfill these hopes and expectations, a fulfillment that could only be met with the Church issuing a strong condemnation of anti-Semitism. John had been “thinking along those lines,” and the pope referred the matter to a German Jesuit by the name of Augustin Bea, who had been made a cardinal the previous year. The idea was that Bea would draft a text about Jewish-Christian relations that the Council would consider for adoption. However, as Jones relates:
The pope’s desire soon was transformed into something radically different when it made contact with the realities of 20th century Jewish interest groups and publicity organs. Before long “the people of the Old Testament” were represented by international Jewish organizations like the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League. Rather than formulating the Catholic position on the Jews in light of Catholic tradition, Cardinal Bea became a go-between between the Jewish organizations and the Council Fathers, who initially were also under the impression they were dealing with the “people of the Old Testament.” Because the Council Fathers were favorably impressed by Jules Isaac’s petition (as opposed to his books, which they had not read), Isaac was allowed to determine the terms of the debate, becoming the principle theorist for the Vatican’s statement on the Jews.
Though Isaac seems to have made a favorable impression overall with Church authorities, he did have his critics. Viscount Leon de Poncins was a journalist and Catholic essay writer who rose to the occasion by mounting a vigorous campaign against the resolution. Also, perhaps by virtue of being a fellow Frenchman, he seems to have had Isaac pegged to a tee. Poncins called Isaac the main promoter of a “campaign being waged against the traditional teachings of the Church,” and predicted (accurately as it turned out) that Nostra Aetate would become “a weapon designed to overthrow traditional Catholicism, which they consider the chief enemy.” Certainly his words, even then, must have had a ring of truth, but unfortunately not all heeded them. The Second Vatican Council “became a battleground over whose interpretation of the Jews was going to be normative,” as Jones puts it, or, in other words, competing visions over what actually the Jews were and are—“people of the Old Testament,” as Isaac portrayed them, or “the avant-garde of modernity and the promoters of sexual deviance as a covert form of control, as Ottaviani implicitly portrayed them”? Of course, for a good many in the Church, the “goal of condemning anti-Semitism seemed noble enough,” and regrettably “the spirit of the times precluded close theological examination of the terms of the discussion.”
The Second Vatican Council convened in October of 1962, and it came to be seen as a contest between Church liberals and conservatives, or at least that’s how it was portrayed in the media, particularly by Time Magazine and one of its reporters, Robert Blair Kaiser, whose reporting seems to have been anything but objective. The Church was out of sync with the modern world in its attitude toward the Jews, and in an effort to remedy that, the pope had “asked Cardinal Bea to prepare a schema for the Council that would revise the old Catholic story about the Jews killing Christ, and thus bringing eternal damnation on them and their children too,” Kaiser reported at one point, asserting that the New Testament’s crucifixion narrative was “a myth that had nurtured anti-Semitism for centuries.” In general, the portrayal of the Council in the media was as a struggle between “the forces of darkness and reaction”—as symbolized by Ottaviani—and “the forces of light and progress.” Among the “forces of light” were those apparently willing to throw out fundamental aspects of Church doctrine and Catholic teaching in an effort to appease the Jews—and ironically, the more they tried to appease, the more outrageous Jewish demands seem to have become.
B’nai B’rith wanted the Church to delete any language it deemed anti-Semitic from the Catholic liturgy. This was a tall order because the liturgy was based on Scripture that was, if not anti-Semitic, then certainly anti-Jewish. Virtually the entire Gospel of St. John and the Acts of the Apostles revolved around the conflict between the Jews who accepted Christ as their savior and the Jews who rejected him. Since those texts were central to any Catholic liturgy and full of invidious comparisons between the New Israel, the Catholic Church, and the Old, repudiated by Christ for its blindness and obstinacy, it was hard to see how dialogue could succeed. Unless, of course, the purpose of dialogue was something other than what it claimed to be.
Opponents of the declaration “claimed that ulterior motives had been driving the discussion from the beginning”—one ulterior motive, of course, being to deal the Catholic Church a crippling blow, a church which at the time, as Jones notes, enjoyed almost “universal esteem.” But as in previous eras of history, the Jews had no trouble finding Christians willing to join their cause. As the discussions progressed, Bea seemed to gravitate increasingly into the Jewish camp, being picked up by limousine at one point for a meeting with Jews at the Park Plaza Hotel in New York, while meanwhile in Rome, Time’s reporter, Kaiser, turned his spacious apartment into “a gathering place for conciliar progressives…those who were pushing hardest for updating everything and doing so with high hilarity.” A series of “soirees” were held in Rome, with Hollywood director Otto Preminger in attendance at one, but as Jones notes:
By this point the Jewish lobbying was beginning to cause a reaction. Pamphlets on the Jews began to appear at the Council. The Jews and the Council in the Light of Holy Scripture by Bernardus offered the most rational presentation from the official Church standpoint. Its message: Scripture states clearly that the Jews were voluntary deicides; the Fathers of the Church supported this doctrine. St. Thomas of Aquinas wrote that the attitude of the Roman Pontiffs can only be interpreted as an affirmation that the Jews partake of a world-wide plot to destroy the Church. Hence, all should be wary of the Jew and not destroy a foundational dogma of the Church.
The Council’s third session began in the fall of 1964, resulting, by November, in passage of “a document on the Jews so heavily influenced by Jewish lobbying that many thought it repudiated traditional Catholic teaching.” As Jones notes, “the Jews rejoiced, but their rejoicing was short-lived” when the schema was rejected by Pope Paul VI. The latter had become pope upon the death of John the previous year, and now he found himself faced with the “unenviable prospect” of having to mediate between warring factions within the Church. And at this point it was the conservatives, that is to say those opposing the declaration, who were gaining the upper hand. In October of 1965, Poncins showed up at the Council carrying thousands of copies of a pamphlet he had written entitled Le Problème Juif face au Concile, or “The Jewish Problem vis-à-vis the Council,” in which he committed the unpardonable, “anti-Semitic” sin of quoting directly from Jewish texts. Among those quoted were Isaac himself, who had previously attacked the Church in writing, calling its teachings:
a tradition which, moreover, is infinitely noxious and murderous, and which, as I have said and shall repeat, leads to Auschwitz—Auschwitz and other places. Some six million Jews were liquidated solely because they were Jews and thus brought shame not only upon the German people but upon the whole of Christianity, because without centuries of Christian teaching, preaching and vituperation, Hitler’s teaching, propaganda and vituperation would have been impossible.
Isaac had also labeled the Gospel of Matthew “obviously tendentious,” and accused the Church fathers of being “persecutors filled with anti-Jewish hatred.” Comments Jones:
Poncins maintained in his tract that the Schema of November of 1964 passed because the bishops were ignorant of Isaac’s true feelings toward Christianity, but, more broadly, they were ignorant of the difference between the Torah and the Talmud. The former is the Word of God; the latter is its antithesis. The Talmud, Poncins pointed out, was a post-Christian confection designed to keep Jews from converting to Christianity. After the destruction of the Temple, “The Talmud replaced the Torah as the foundation of all wisdom and the guide in every detail of daily life.” The point of the Talmud was “to consummate the definite break from triumphant Christianity.” So “The imposition of the ideals of the Talmud on the new branch of Judaism has been the calamity of the Jewish people even to this day.”…

The schema was dangerous because “it put the Church in the position of the accused, guilty of the permanent, unjustifiable and unatonable crime of anti-Semitism for two thousand years.” Beyond that, it questioned “the good faith and truthfulness of the Evangelists, of St. John and St. Matthew in particular, it discredited the teaching of the Fathers of the Church and of the great doctrinarians of the papacy by depicting them in distasteful colors; in short, it threatened to demolish the very bastions of Catholic doctrine.”

Poncins also argued against viewing modern-day Jews as “the people of the Old Testament,” demonstrating that their desire was not a Messiah, but “a terrestrial reign in which they will control the social, economic and political life of the nations…Judaism seeks to impose itself as the sole standard and to reduce the world to Jewish values.” Keep in mind, this was written in 1965. Clearly a man in many respects ahead of his time, Poncins concluded that the Jewish schema was an attack on the Church “under the banner of ecumenism,” and that in allowing Jews unprecedented access in the formulation of the document, the Church had provided them with a means of carrying a “war…into the very interior of the Church itself.”
As may be expected, given Pope Paul’s “unenviable prospects” in trying to negotiate an end to the strife, what ended up passing was a document that seemingly offered concessions to both sides.
The schema on the Jews was incorporated into a “Declaration on the Relation of the Church to Non-Christian Religions,” known as Nostra Aetate, promulgated by the Council on October 28, 1965…On the whole, the conservatives were jubilant, and the Jews were disappointed, but the results in light of the actual document were mixed. Jews were disappointed that the charge of deicide was not rebuked. But conservatives were disappointed the text did not implicate all the Jews in deicide. In one of the cleverest lines in the document, the Council Fathers wrote, “Even though the Jewish authorities and those who followed their lead pressed for the death of Christ (cf. John 19:6), neither all Jews indiscriminately at that time, nor Jews today, can be charged with the crimes committed during his passion.” According to the principles of logic, that statement could be taken to assert that some Jews were responsible for Christ’s death. If we exclude from that group the Blessed Mother, the Beloved Disciple, and all of the other Jews who accepted Christ as the Messiah, we come up with a statement that is largely faithful to the gospels texts.
But it didn’t end there. The Church was left divided, while “an indignant press campaign” ensued, provoking even more controversy, and Jones believes that in essence both sides ended up losing. Those who supported the document were accused of having sold out to international Jewry, while opponents were held practically “co-responsible” for the rise of Hitler. Furthermore, the disjunction between the Jews of Christ’s time, and those of today, raised a double standard on the issue of “collective responsibility”:
Jews could hold the German people accountable for Hitler’s crimes, forcing generations of German taxpayers to pay billions in reparations to Jewish organizations and the state of Israel. But Jews vehemently denied collective responsibility for the death of Christ. The Council’s schema tried to have it both ways, repudiating the claim the Romans alone were responsible for Christ’s death, but limiting Jewish guilt to Jewish leaders and their followers. As Poncins points out, in the case of Germany in the 20th century, “The whole people is considered responsible and subsequently punished for faults officials committed by its leaders, even when [those faults] are unknown to a great part of the people.” On the other hand, the Gospel accounts make clear that many Jewish people in Jerusalem were aware of what their leaders were doing and supported them in their efforts.
In addition to the above, one other factor figured prominently—most likely unanticipated saving perhaps by Poncins and a few others—namely the power of the Jewish media, for the Church ultimately lost control over the document’s interpretation. While Nostra Aetate had its share of “clever” lines, there were also passages that aided the “hijacking” of the resolution’s meaning, with Jones pointing to the following as one of the most glaring examples: “The Church…deplores all hatreds, persecutions, displays of anti-Semitism leveled at any time or from any source against the Jews.” Thus the document condemns anti-Semitism, but, and this became the crucial point, without defining the meaning of the term. It was “an omission of truly catastrophic proportions,” says Jones, and here we might again consider the words of Poncins:
In Jewish eyes, every measure of defense and protection against the penetration of Jewish ideas and conceptions, against anti-Christian Jewish heresies, against Jewish control of the national economy, and in general every measure of defense of national Christian traditions is a manifestation of anti-Semitism. Furthermore, many Jews consider that the very fact of the recognition of the existence of a Jewish question constitutes a declaration of anti-Semitism…

Jules Isaac accuses all the Fathers of the Church of anti-Semitism…He accuses them of having unleashed the savagery of the beast and of being the real people responsible for German anti-Semitism and the gas chambers at Auschwitz. He finds them even worse that Hitler and Streicher and others for their system resulted in the Jews being tortured slowly and being left to live and suffer interminably…Does the Church admit Jules Isaac’s thesis and plead guilty?

For the next four-plus decades, Nostra Aetate would be used exactly as Poncins had predicted, i.e. as “a weapon designed to overthrow traditional Catholicism,” or as another writer described it, it was “the cornerstone of the abusive relationship that has hamstrung the Catholics.” By way of example, we might point to the passion play performed at the Bavarian village of Oberammergau. The play is a huge production and has a long tradition dating back to the year 1634, but one year after the passage of Nostra Aetate, the American Jewish Congress demanded that directors of the play make changes in the script or face a boycott. In support of its efforts, the AJC marched out a bevy of celebrities including Arthur Miller, Lionel Trilling, Stanley Kunitz, Leonard Bernstein, Leslie Fiedler, Theodore Bikel, Irving Howe, and Alfred Kazin, and even several German writers, including George Steiner, Guenter Grass (yes, that Guenter Grass), Heinrich Boell, and Paul Celan. Also in support of the effort was Elie Wiesel, whose account of his Auschwitz experience in recent years has been highly challenged, but in November of 1966, Wiesel, surrounded by the other celebrities, held a news conference in New York where he asserted:
The artist cannot be silent when the arts are used to exalt hatred. If the people of Oberammergau feel that they cannot faithfully represent their vision except through an explicitly anti-Semitic text, then others have no choice but to denounce that vision and urge that all who share our view join with us in condemning the performance.
Jews even enlisted Catholic theologians in their efforts, but the greatest weapon in their arsenal was Nostra Aetate, or as one Jewish writer put it, “Oberammergau was caught between the anvil of Vatical II and the hammering criticism of Jewish groups.” Caught not so much because of what the document said, but, as Jones argues, “because the Church could never make its interpretation of its own document prevail over the interpretation which the Jews wanted to impose on it.” Not surprisingly, the Bavarians made concessions. But of course, the more ground they gave, the more the Jews demanded of them. Changes to the play were adopted in 1970, in 1980, and again in 1984. The lesson to be drawn is that “interfaith dialogue” is always a one-way street—with Jews making demands, and Christians giving in. So it has been in the past, and so it remains to this day.
***
The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit is a remarkable look back at the past, but it is even more than that. By understanding history, we understand the world we live in today, and Jones provides an invaluable service in helping us to understand the “revolutionary spirit” of Jewish power—how it operates, how it evolved, and how it maintains itself. Besides the three chapters I have covered here, you’ll find others, focusing on various periods of history, particularly of the last 500 years, offering insights into what at times seems like a living, breathing animus…as well as the volatile reactions that sometimes occur when that animus (the “revolutionary spirit,” as it were) comes into contact with unsuspecting Gentiles. I’m talking about events such as England’s consolidation as a Protestant, and philosemitic, power under the reigns of Cromwell and Queen Elizabeth I; the rise of Freemasonry; and the Russian revolution—all events in which, as most of us are well aware, key roles were played by Jews.
But other historical offshoots—episodes lesser-known, perhaps, but in which Jews nonetheless played equally significant roles behind the scenes—are also covered here. Jones includes a chapter on the Jewish criminal Leo Frank, who in 1913 murdered a 14-year-old girl employed as a child laborer in his factory in Atlanta. We also get the American Civil War, the civil rights movement, as well historical portraits of figures like Frederick Douglas, Marcus Garvey, and Lorraine Hansberry—with the book culminating finally in chapters on the Jewish takeover of American culture and the rise of the neoconservatives. Jones packs it with information every step of the way, and basically what he gives us is “the other side of the story,” the parts of history that somehow got left out of school textbooks (textbooks which, if we looked closely enough, we’d probably find were published by Jewish-owned publishing houses). No doubt, were it to become a bestseller, such a book would pose a public relations nightmare to Jews.
This is not to say I don’t have some criticisms. I do. Like many Christians of both the past and present, Jones takes a dim view of the ancient Gnostics, and in an early chapter of the book he discusses Irenaeus, a bishop in the early church, who in the second century condemned Gnosticism in his tract, Adversus Haereses, or “Against Heresies.” Writes Jones:
Irenaeus’ work, as its title implies, was written to combat heresy, specifically Gnosticism, but in entering that fray he had to deal with the Jews, acknowledging “from the very beginning of the Gnostic attack on Christianity,” that Gnosticism was associated with judaizing.
Far from attacking Christianity, many, if not most, Gnostics were Christians themselves. Moreover, such views would seem to overlook Gnostic groups such as the Sethians and the Marcionites, who were very much opposed to worshipping the God of the Old Testament, and who, at least in the case of the Marcionites, sought to eliminate the Old Testament entirely from the Christian canon of sacred literature. Had that happened, the course of history, needless to say, would have been quite different. The Judaizers—neither they of Pfefferkorn’s time, nor those of today—would have had a leg to stand on.
Another quibble I have with the book is the omission of a bibliography. The book is extremely well documented, with roughly 5,000 source notes, but Jones habitually refers to the numerous authors he quotes by last name only, which leaves you with the task of going back through hundreds of footnotes searching for the initial author citation and the title of the work quoted. The inclusion of a bibliography would have eliminated this problem.
All in all, however, this is an extremely important work and one that should be read any and all concerned about Jewish supremacism and the extent of Jewish power in the world today.
The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit is published by Fidelity Press, South Bend, Indiana. The book is available for order here.
***
A couple of other things I’ll mention quickly before cutting to the videos. Firstly, a brief elucidation regarding a “red thread” that gets mentioned during the interview but that unfortunately is never elaborated upon—on page 19, in the book’s introduction, Jones talks about a tradition recorded in the Talmud (Rosh Hashanah 31b), of Jewish priests in the second-temple era supposedly determining how successful temple sacrifices had been—i.e. “successful” in terms of expiating the sins of the Jews—through observance of a scarlet thread. If the thread turned white, the sacrifice had been accepted by God and the sins expiated. “According to Schoeman, the Talmud itself ‘unwittingly confirms’ that the Temple sacrifices failed 40 years before the destruction of the Temple in 70 a.d. (i.e. at the time Christ died and the veil covering the Holy of Holies was rent in two) when it “recounts that from that time on…the scarlet thread never again turned white,” writes Jones.
And finally, a new interview with Jones has just been posted at The Ugly Truth. Though quite interesting, the interview deals primarily with current events in the Middle East rather than with the book, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
 The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

The Zionist Infestation Of Africa: Zimbabwe To Uganda, Congo To Somalia And Beyond

Africa has been infiltrated
and infested by international
Zionism; its resources
are being bled dry by a guild
of Jewish criminals.
(graphic by Skulz Fontaine)

by Jonathan Azaziah

It isn’t matter of debate, on any level, that historically, Africa has been the most tormented and tortured of the planet’s continents and regions. Ravaged by centuries of colonialism and its bastard child, the Transatlantic Slave Trade, imperialism, civil wars instigated by foreign intelligence agencies, the plundering of natural resources and faux “humanitarian” interventions en masse, it seems that Africa just cannot find the salaam it undeniably and screamingly deserves. Much has been written about Africa’s plight being a product of Western aggression and Western racism but this is only a partial truth, as is so often the case when a discussion of world events and world history is initiated in the modern era of media domination, manipulation and disinformation. There are hidden hands behind every bit of genocide and suffering in Africa, past and present alike.

In the groundbreaking works The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews: Volume One, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews: Volume Two – How Jews Gained Control of the Black American Economy and Jews Selling Blacks: Slave Sale Advertising by American Jews, the Historical Research Department of the Nation of Islam, based 100% on Jewish (oftentimes rabbinical) and philo-Semitic sources, unequivocally demonstrates that the torturous, inhuman and genocidal Transatlantic Slave Trade was an endeavor dominated by Jews, going back to the very beginnings of it in Brazil and Surinam. Despite a systematic smear campaign still going on to this day, the Jewish-Zionist Power Configuration has failed miserably in refuting the scholarly volumes because of the meticulous sourcing. What makes this revelation all the more intriguing, as well as disturbing, is that this hegemony wasn’t only material and physical, with Jews operating as both slave owners and slave traders; it was also ideological, with Jews passing down their dehumanizing religious beliefs to their Anglo partners in human misery.

The Talmud:
Judaism’s holiest book,
where anti-Gentile hatred is emphatic;
it is here where the anti-African
fable known as the “Curse of
Ham” was born.

In the Jewish religion, as ordained by the Babylonian Talmud, Blacks are eternally cursed through the channel known as “The Curse of Ham.” Though the curse originated in Chapter 9 of Genesis in the Bible, no racial identity was applied to Ham, son of the prophet Noah, and there was certainly no anti-Black prejudice. The racist origins of The Curse of Ham originated within the ‘wise’ rabbinic pages of the Talmud, which damned Blacks to an infinite existence of enslavement. Stated the rabbis, “Ham is told by his outraged father that, because you have abused me in the darkness of night, your children shall be born black and ugly; because you have twisted your head to cause me embarrassment, they shall have kinky hair and red eyes; because your lips jested at my expense theirs shall swell; and because you neglected my nakedness, they shall go naked (1).” Moses Maimonides, Judaism’s most celebrated rabbinic ‘sage,’ has written that Blacks are “irrational animals” who are “below mankind but above monkeys (2).”

Maimonides’ views are central to the overall Jewish view of Black people, as his name among Jews is an infallible and holy one. Talmudic rabbis have deepened The Curse of Ham over time, attributing bestiality as a regular engagement among Blacks, concocting depraved sexual fantasies of Ham fornicating with dogs and ravens and thus, having his skin damned with even more blackness for his perversion (3). Sick would be an understatement; demented wouldn’t even begin the description. And when the usurping Zionist regime’s policies towards Ethiopian Jews are examined in depth, and they are nothing short of emphatically deplorable, as well as Jewish discrimination against Blacks in the United States due to the disproportionate Jewish accumulation of wealth (4), it is as clear as the sky is dark when the sun falls that these hideous Talmudic beliefs are very much intact today, in the main blocs of Jewish life.

The Rothschild family, the infamous and monstrously powerful Jewish dynasty of bankers, socialites and philanthropists who are rightly considered to be the godfathers of the criminal Zionist entity, are also linked to profiting from the Transatlantic Slave Trade (5). The Rothschild family was also fervently Talmudist, a tradition dating back to the family’s grandsire, Mayer Amschel himself, who was described by one S.J. Cohen in an unofficial, albeit accurate and authoritative biography of the Jewish financier entitled, “The Exemplary Life of The Immortal Banker Mr. Mayer Amschel Rothschild,” as a “zealous believer in the Talmud and chose it alone as the guiding principle of all his actions (6).” Therefore, it shouldn’t be one bit astonishing that the Rothschild family would take part in such a cruel, murderous practice as slavery, as their Jewish beliefs dictated to them that it was perfectly okay to do so; their halfwit, nonsensical apologies notwithstanding. The Rothschild dynasty’s beliefs are also intrinsic to the spread of British and French colonialism throughout the African continent.

The House of Rothschild:
Talmudist Jewish banking
dynasty that financed the
colonial rape of Africa.

As the courageous polemical poet and hero Ezra Pound once said, “Until you know who has lent what to whom, you know nothing whatever of politics, you know nothing whatever of history, you know nothing of international wrangles.” The British and French governments would have not have carried out and could not have carried out their blood-soaked colonial adventures in Africa without an elephantine amount of money, which they indeed did receive from their central banks in London and Paris respectively, as is properly acknowledged by history. What isn’t discussed or dare it even be said, what is ignored for fear of what lies beneath the surface, is that the these central banks, according to a cornucopia of Jewish sources, were under Rothschild dominion, with James Mayer in Paris and Nathan Mayer, described frequently in his time as “King of the Jews,” in London. Millionaires of Jewish extraction were very much the power of France’s financial scene and all of them were surrogates of the House of Rothschild. Jews of socialist, imperialist and republican political backgrounds all worked for the same cause: the furtherance of Rothschild power. As for Britain, the vast majority of the imperial power’s financial transactions were handled by the Rothschild dynasty (7).

To be clear, the House of Rothschild did not have a mere lackadaisical connection to colonial imperialism, as if they were a fantastical caricature of financial greed, sitting in the lap of luxury while their “money worked for them.” These were Jewish fanatics who sincerely believed in subjugating the planet according to their tribal holy books, plundering the wealth of the goyim as they were meant to do as “God’s chosen people,” as confirmed so hatefully and vividly by this Babylonian Talmud excerpt, BT Baba Bathra 54b, “Property of gentiles is like the desert; whoever among the Jews gets there first, owns it (8).” The Rothschilds were the active disseminators of colonialism and imperialism and there is no clearer evidence of this than Cecil Rhodes, perhaps the most famous advocate of British world domination and considered to be a pioneer of the British colonial enterprise. This assessment however is quite deceptive as since the early 1880s, Cecil Rhodes was nothing but a proxy for the Rothschild family, who had a “substantial financial hold” over him. Rhodes, who with Rothschild capital established supremacy over the African diamond trade, reported directly to Nathan Mayer himself (9).

It was the Rothschild frontman Cecil Rhodes who, in accordance with the hegemonic plans of his Talmudist masters, established the genocidal colony of Rhodesia, just north of South Africa, setting off a century of tumultuous conflict and unnecessary bloodshed. Rhodesia would go from colony of the Rothschild Empire, to the sadistic apartheid regime of Ian Smith from 1965-1980, to the nation known today as Zimbabwe, and it is here, where the introduction will end and the study shall begin. The Jewish exploitation of Africa has not ended; it has simply changed faces from the Talmudic financial expansionism of the House of Rothschild to the Zionism of the usurping Jewish entity in Palestine.

Ruth Feigenbaum and Rabbi
Moshe Silberhaft: Zionist agents
attempting to impose Jewish
cultural imperialism on Zimbabwe.

Infiltrated Zimbabwe: Cultural Zionism Spreads Under The Guise Of “Humanitarianism”

On March 1st, 2012, a curious article appeared in the Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA), the self-described “Global News Service of the Jewish People,” entitled, “In face of desperate African poverty, Ruth Feigenbaum provides a beacon of hope (10).” Feigenbaum, according to the JTA, became involved in human rights activities in Zimbabwe after her gardener (read: servant) was diagnosed with HIV and subsequently passed away three days later. The entire ordeal “deeply upset” Feigenbaum. Described as a “major player” in Zimbabwe, Feigenbaum used her “international Jewish connections” to build up charities inside Bulawayo, Zimbabwe’s second largest city.

One such group that assisted her was the World Jewish Relief of London, an organization with a heavy hand in Africa and funded by a who’s who of Zionist consulting firms and Jewish fashion magnates including, but by no means limited to, Marks and Spencer, PO Ltd and Paula Ohrenstein Ltd, Lucy Wernick and Associates, Barry Finer, Majesta Ltd and the Jacobson Group (11). Some of the World Jewish Relief of London’s notable partners are B’nai B’rith, the institution of exclusively Jewish Freemasonry that the Zionist spy nest known as the Anti-Defamation League is intrinsically attached to, the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, a group originally founded as a distribution channel for funds used in the Jewish-Zionist plot to steal Palestine, Lyceum Shaalavim, an Orthodox Jewish school that specializes in Talmudist teachings and the Jewish Forum of Ukraine, a group tied to Zionist fundraising groups throughout the Eastern European nation (12).

Apart from the alarming connections of the World Jewish Relief of London to the international Zionist criminal network and the racist core of Orthodox Jewry, the real reason why Feigenbaum is bouncing around Zimbabwe is revealed by her words, and it isn’t “humanitarianism.” Feigenbaum, referring to Zimbabwean children that she works with, said, “They have learned something about Jews and Judaism from me (10).” Assuredly, what these precious, innocent and unsuspecting children “learned” wasn’t the Curse of Ham or the teachings of Maimonides.

Furthermore, Feigenbaum was assisted in her efforts by a South African rabbi named Moshe Silberhaft, who provided her with books for the children that she works with and who a library in her community would be named after. The JTA report noted that, “In her work with local Zimbabweans, Feigenbaum has introduced some Jewish teachings. During the library dedication, she had tears in her eyes watching the orphans sing songs in the two main indigenous Zimbabwean languages, Shona and Ndebele, as well as in English and Hebrew.” Feigenbaum also made mention that, “They greet me on every visit with a ‘shalom’ and thank me by saying ‘todah rabah.’ At Pesach time, with the matzah sent to us by Rabbi Moshe, I arrange a third seder so they can learn a little about our customs (10).”

The African Jewish Congress
is an outpost of Zionism that
is vital to “Israeli” hegemony
over the African continent.

What was conspicuously absent from the JTA report, information that confirms who Feigenbaum really is and what her truly sinister intentions are is that she is a member of the African Jewish Congress (13), a Zionist Lobby group which helps African Jews “retain their links with World Jewry” and which maintains organizational goals of “fighting anti-Semitism” and promoting the interests of the usurping Zionist entity. The African Jewish Congress is an affiliate of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies and the World Jewish Congress (14), one of the most powerful Jewish-Zionist groups on the planet. The executive director of the African Jewish Congress is none other than Rabbi Moshe Silberhaft, Feigenbaum’s partner in Zimbabwe, who was rabbinically ordained in occupied al-Quds and is a citizen of the criminal Zionist entity (15). To repeat, Feigenbaum is no “humanitarian,” no “human rights activist”; she is a cultural Zionist imposing cultural Zionism (also known as Jewish cultural imperialism) on a native population.

The legendary Nigerian revolutionary and musical renegade Fela Kuti famously declared that European cultural imperialism was the biggest enemy of the African and was the thing most vital for him to fight against. In this spirit, an addendum should be added that Jewish cultural imperialism (Cultural Zionism) is an enemy just as deadly to the African if not more so due to Jewish religious teachings and Zionist occupation policy (which is rooted in Judaic “wisdom”) both being inherently anti-Black. Cultural Zionism will install in its African victims a brutal cognitive dissonance in which they vehemently despise racism but also love Zionists, despite their abyssal and ancient supremacist beliefs, specifically in regards to the African, who, in their Judaic worldview, is eternally damned to slavery and “blackness” because of the Curse of Ham.

Asher Zvi Hirsch Ginsberg:
Jewish supremacist and
founder of Cultural Zionism.

Cultural Zionism was created and developed by Jewish supremacist and educated Talmudist Ahad Ha’am (real name: Asher Zvi Hirsch Ginsberg), who viewed the criminal Zionist project as a means of founding a “spiritual center for World Jewry (16),” the indigenous Palestinian people be damned. What Africans need to know is that at the very heart of Cultural Zionism is the destruction of everything that is not Jewish for the furtherance of Jewish interests, as evidenced by the “Greater Israel” doctrine (17). Ruth Feigenbaum’s advances in Zimbabwe are merely the beginning of something far more sinister, far more dangerous, like the early Jewish-Zionist settlers in Palestine before her, advancing Jewish cultural imperialism slowly and cunningly.

An integral part of Cultural Zionism is spying and reconnaissance, understanding the indigenous culture before encroaching upon it and destroying it, and fifth columnists for the usurping Zionist entity is exactly what Feigenbaum, Silberhaft and the African Jewish Congress are. It is not coincidental that their activities have heightened at a time not too long after the Zimbabwean government of President Robert Mugabe stood defiantly against international Zionism and its proxies in Washington D.C. and London by vowing to provide the Islamic Republic of Iran with uranium for its peaceful program, despite crippling economic aggression. Indeed, Zimbabwean Foreign Minister Simbarashe Mumbengegwi pointedly declared, “Restrictions against the two countries {Zimbabwe and Iran} are not accidental. Western states follow the approach of sanction towards countries which do not yield to their domination and act against their interest (18).”

The cruel sanctions against the Islamic Revolution are well-known. The Western economic war against Mugabe’s Zimbabwe however is a hidden truth, the root cause of the hardships currently being struggled against by the Zimbabwean people and one that was also deliberately absent from the JTA report on Fiegenbaum and her Zionist “activism.”

From the moment of Zimbabwean independence from the Rothschild Empire, Mugabe, himself imprisoned by the apartheid regime for a decade (1964-1974), initiated a program of land reform aimed at redistributing the land confiscated by the Rhodesian settlers back to their rightful owners: native Zimbabweans. The British government, an agent for Rothschild interests, entered into an agreement with Mugabe that it would take care of the Rhodesian settlers. Typically, it reneged, in a deliberate attempt to break the back of the Zimbabwean government and send the country into chaos. Mugabe, who built excellent programs of national health care and education, resulting in a literacy rate of 95% among indigenous Zimbabweans, the highest in Africa, as compared to an abysmal 39% during the apartheid years, resisted in the name of his people. And as a result of his sincere resistance to the Western plot, the American and British governments, as well as the IMF, an institution dominated by Zionist Jewry, imposed devastating sanctions on his country. The sanctions have prevented the Mugabe government from importing raw materials, laying the agricultural and industrial sectors of Zimbabwe to waste (19).

Robert Mugabe has been
steadfast in defending
his nation from Western
aggression and Jewish
exploitation.

Because of Mugabe’s historical principled stance on Palestine, and his courageous efforts to stop Jewish monopolization of Zimbabwe’s clothing and textile sectors (20), the usurping “Israeli” regime has joined in the economic aggression against the southern African nation of Resistance. The Zionist regime’s Industry, Trade and Labor Ministry, along with the Kimberley Process, an “Israeli”-run forum that fronts as a “human rights” group interested in stopping the flow of blood diamonds onto global markets, and Human Rights Watch, the notorious NGO funded by billionaire Zionist mega criminal George Soros to the tune of $100 million (21), teamed up to punish Zimbabwe for alleged (read: non-existent) human rights abuses and corruption (22).

The utter egregiousness aside, what makes the matter so pathetically farcical and so laughably hypocritical, is that the largest exporter of diamonds in the world is “Israel,” and every diamond it produces is a blood diamond due to the fact that it stands accused of war crimes, crimes against humanity, ethnic cleansing, genocide, apartheid and extrajudicial executions inside and outside of its (ever-expanding) territory. The Zionist entity uses the money it procures from its blood diamonds to fund the criminal 64-year occupation of Palestine (23). And, in a stunning twist of fateful irony, just recently, an “Israeli” pilot named Shmuel Kainan Klein was caught by Zimbabwean immigration officials in an attempt to smuggle diamonds to Tel Aviv (24). The Zionist assault on the Zimbabwean people isn’t a new phenomenon either. While Mugabe was fighting the Rhodesian apartheid regime of Ian Smith, “Israel” was advising it, assisting it and arming it, with its patented “Uzi” machine guns and refurbished US helicopters (25).

With reports abound in the Zionist media about Mugabe’s failing health, all of which, for the record, are false and likely planted by enemy intelligence agencies (26), the African Jewish Congress’ Ruth Feigenbaum still operating and his nation’s relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran gaining more ground with each passing day, it is certain that for the foreseeable future, Zimbabweans will not know peace, as they haven’t since the first day the Rothschild stooge Cecil Rhodes illegally stepped foot on their land.

The Kony2012
campaign just
unbearably reeks
of Zionist propaganda.

A Zionist Plot In Uganda: Kony2012 Sensationalism and Disinformation Galore

On March 5th, 2012, the worldwide web was set ablaze by a glossy, emotional and deceptive video called “Kony2012” about a Central African rebel group known as the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) and its leader Joseph Kony. Produced by a group called Invisible Children, the Kony2012 campaign attracted celebrities from across the (Jewish-run) Hollywood spectrum and garnered major attention from the Zionist media. If these weren’t suspect enough, the red flags were solidified upon examining the campaign poster, which featured Joseph Kony alongside Osama Bin Laden and National Socialist Germany’s Adolf Hitler.

Slamming a leader as “Hitler,” his country as “Germany” and his people as “Nazis” is a common, tiresome, ad hominem and reprehensibly slanderous attack that the Jewish Power Matrix has utilized incessantly since the horrific fall of National Socialism at the hands of the genocidal Allied Axis during WW2, most specifically against the German people themselves, Palestinians and Iraqis. And Osama Bin Laden of course, has been the boogeyman used by international Zionism to justify its ongoing Orwellian “war on terror.” The matter was quite reminiscent of the “Save Darfur” farce, a campaign that began as an exclusive project of the American Jewish community, with hardline Zionist groups like the American Jewish World Service and Jewish Community Relations Council leading the way in the propagandistic assault on the government of Sudan. More than half of the $100 million raised ended up in “Israeli” banks to fund illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank (27).

Kony2012 is no less fraudulent as Joseph Kony is wrongfully depicted as this supremely influential warlord who has built up a massive, murderous army through the widespread physical, psychological and sexual abuse of child soldiers. Nowhere in the video does it mention that Kony’s LRA was originally comprised of the Acholi people, an ethnic group repressed and enslaved by the Rothschild-financed British colonialists. Nor does it mention that the LRA was formed to combat discrimination and resist the military dictatorship of Yoweri Museveni, who receives $45 million yearly from the US government to assist the fight against Al-Shabab, the Islamic Resistance of occupied Somalia. Conveniently, it also doesn’t mention that the LRA hasn’t been active in Uganda or anywhere else in Central Africa since 2006 and Kony himself has been AWOL for some time. The video is a con, pure and simple, and a dangerous one at that, as it attempts to create a pretext (capturing Kony) to justify American military aggression against Uganda and deepen the already-troublesome presence of AFRICOM on the continent (28).

Invisible Children is a
proxy of USAID, the
odious next of spies
and organ of international
Zionism.

Despite all of the hype however, Kony2012 is now in shambles. Jason Russell, co-founder of Invisible Children and the driving force behind the viral video, has brought disgrace to the initiative after melting down in public by swearing and screaming to himself, behaving lasciviously and pounding the sidewalk with both hands, all while being in the nude (29). Moreover, Invisible Children has been caught spying for the brutal Museveni regime and backing US-intelligence-led Ugandan military operations that left scores of innocent men, women and children dead (30). In the most devastating blow, and what is now absolute corroboration of previous analytical deductions that pegged Invisible Children as an organ of the arrogant powers, it has been revealed that the NGO is being funded and supported through the Northern Uganda Transition Initiative of USAID (31), the State Department apparatus so often associated with CIA-type operations and spying, as evidenced most recently by its activities of infiltration in educational institutions across Lebanon (32).

And it is here where the Zionist ball of yarn seriously and uncontrollably unravels. The Deputy Administrator of USAID is Donald Steinberg, a lifetime diplomat who has served in multiple high-level positions in the US government including, most notably, Director for African Affairs at the National Security Council (1994-95) and senior advisor to President Clinton on all African issues, as well as Principal Deputy Director of Policy Planning for the US State Department (2001-2003), where he intimately assisted Secretary of State Colin Powell with the reconstruction of occupied Afghanistan. Steinberg is also a devoted Zionist who has played a key role in maintaining the status quos of the criminal occupations of Palestine and Kashmir through the Zionist-dominated “peace process” and its ugly sister, “conflict resolution (33).”

USAID chief
Donald K.
Steinberg:
lifelong
devotee of
imposing the
Zionist agenda
upon Africa.

Steinberg is hated across the African continent for his role in the Rwandan Genocide, in which he advised the Jewish-run, philo-Semitic, war criminal Clinton administration to ignore the terrible bloodshed that would unfold. Steinberg now serves as Deputy President of the International Crisis Group (34), a mightily influential Zionist think tank founded by neoconservative hawk Morton Abramowitz and the aforementioned George Soros. Despite his “humanitarian credentials,” it is clear from his positions and associates that Steinberg is a top rank agent of the Cultural Zionism project in Africa. And as a commander of the powerful USAID, there is no doubt that Steinberg ensures a policy that grants loans only to those groups who are willing to pursue the Zionist agenda.

Ugandan dictator Yoweri Museveni is also deeply involved with the usurping Zionist regime, hence why he receives tens of millions in aid from the Zionist-occupied United States government, which never compromises “Israeli” interests when in comes to setting up client regimes. He made his first visit to Jewish-occupied Palestine in 2003 when he met with the genocidal mass murderer Prime Minister Ariel Sharon (real name: Ariel Scheinermann) and psychotic hardliner Foreign Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (real name: Benjamin Mileikowsky) for the purpose of securing arms. His most recent visit, in November 2011, with Netanyahu and massacrer of Qana Shimon Peres (real name: Szymon Perski), was in regards to more arms and amplification of economic aid. The meeting was organized by Rafi Eitan, the infamous former Palmach commander and Mossad operations director, who is now setting up business operations in Uganda (undoubtedly for further “Israeli” penetration) with the help of Museveni (35).

It must be stated that it is quite possible, nay, quite highly probable that Yoweri Museveni wouldn’t be in power today if wasn’t for the Zionist entity due to the usurping regime’s intimate involvement in the downfall of former Ugandan leader, the misunderstood and demonized Idi Amin, who reigned from 1971-1979. During the opening months of his presidency, Amin had close ties with the Jewish supremacist entity, forging economic and military alliances with it. “Israeli” military advisors set up training camps for the Ugandan air force and infantry and there were routine meetings between Zionist occupation and Ugandan officials. The Zionist entity sold Amin jets, tanks and guns of all kinds, while its companies became involved in building Uganda’s infrastructure, including houses and roads. In exchange, Amin agreed to assist Zionist efforts to fragment Sudan (36).

After turning against
the usurping Zionist
entity in 1972, Ugandan
leader Idi Amin became
a target that had to be
“dealt with.”

“Israel” however, despite the vast involvement it already had in Uganda, was not living up to the agreements it had made with Amin and he began to look elsewhere in the region for assistance. His breakthrough who came with none other than Muammar al-Qadhdhafi, the fallen Libyan leader who had been a thorn in the side of international Zionism from the very beginning of his reign. Qadhdhafi “berated” Amin for collaborating with Zionism and told him that the assistance was his as long as he promised to end his ties with the occupier of Palestine. Amin agreed and within two weeks, he had already taken measures to remove all Zionist Jews from Uganda and began issuing calls at the UN for “Israel” to be removed as a member and for “Israelis” to be expelled from Palestine back to Britain which he (rightly) viewed as responsible for helping birth the criminal Jewish “state.” He also began actively aiding the Palestinian Resistance. Right on queue, like clockwork, the Zionist media began depicting Amin as an “anti-Semite” and “brutal dictator” who ran a “terror regime” that “murdered hundreds of thousands of Ugandans belonging to tribes that opposed” it (36).

It was the “Entebbe Crisis,” which lasted from June 27th, 1976 to July 4th, 1976, that ultimately led to the disintegration of Idi Amin’s regime, tarnishing his image internationally and weakening him internally. Out of the ashes of what the Zionists would call “Operation Entebbe,” President of Tanzania Julius Nyerere would take action against Idi Amin at a time when he viewed the Ugandan leader and his army as weak. Nyerere would send 40,000 troops into the Ugandan capital of Kampala in April 1979, the culmination of three years of conflict, where the Tanzanian forces would emerge victorious drive Amin into exile (36). What isn’t known about these two events, other than that they are indeed connected, is that the Zionist entity fomented and manipulated both of them.

The “Israeli” internal
security service, Shin Bet,
orchestrated the Entebbe
false flag hijacking
to bring down Idi Amin and
weaken the PLO.

The Entebbe Crisis began when the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) allegedly hijacked a plane in Athens and subsequently flew the plane into Entebbe; 98 persons, most of them “Israeli” Jews, were held hostage. The operation was reported worldwide as an act of terrorism, with Idi Amin being a “state sponsor of terror.” This narrative, like every other narrative of the Jewish-Zionist media, is a lie. In truth, the hijacking was a false flag attacked staged by the “Israeli” internal security service, Shin Bet (or Shabak), who had infiltrated the PFLP and planted “all sorts of wild elements” within the organization’s mix. The intention of the operation, other than to undermine Idi Amin, was to weaken the PLO in the eyes of France and the United States. The crisis came to a close when elite “Israeli” occupation commandos raided Entebbe Airport, bringing the Zionist false flag theater to its closing act and rescuing the hostages. “Israeli” Prime Minister Netanyahu’s brother, Yonatan, died during the raid (37).

Tanzania, led by Julius Nyerere from 1961 until his retirement in 1985, was an “Israeli” client state from the moment of its independence in 1964, establishing uninterrupted security, diplomatic and economic ties (38). Most recently, the Zionist entity has taken a substantial portion of control of Tanzania’s vast mining operations, with the Engelinvest mega corporation of “Israeli” moneyman Jacob Engel taking hold of three mines, and securing dominion over Tanzanian gold, copper, nickel and other metals (39). Nyerere himself was not only an ally of the Jewish occupation regime but a devoted supporter of the Zionist cause, once ridiculously and insultingly declaring that war criminal Golda Meir (real name: Golda Mabovich) was the “mother of Africa.” Nyerere personally (and nonsensically, for that matter) believed that any enemy of the Jews (“Israel”) was an enemy of the Blacks (Africa). The relations between Tanzania and “Israel” were of a special kind and there is no doubt that this was due to the ideological veneration of Nyerere (40), which was highly peculiar for a Third World leader of his stature.

Amin’s heroic intransigence made his removal a prime Zionist objective in Africa, and with these revelations regarding the bond between Tanzania and Zionism now in context, there can be doubt there was an “Israeli” hand in Nyerere’s crippling of Amin and his government. The Ugandan people, now being ruled by the pro-“Israel” dictator Museveni, can only wonder “what if…” in regards to what has transpired since that fateful 1976 summer in Entebbe; “what if…” Amin emerged triumphant over “Israel.”

The tentacles of international
Zionism extend throughout
the globe and deep into the
continent of Africa.

Conclusion: Welcome To Africa, Where Zionist Tentacles Extend Throughout The Continent

On November 23rd 2010, an important story reported in the Hebrew press of the Zionist entity, then picked up by the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Press TV, revealed a rather bothersome development. A retired “Israeli” colonel by the name of Avi Sivan had died in a helicopter crash near Yaounde, the capital of the Central African nation of Cameroon. Sivan was responsible for training the Cameroonian presidential guard and was also the head of the Jewish supremacist entity’s military delegation to Cameroon (41). The question was, “if the Zionist entity’s tentacles in Africa had penetrated a nation as geopolitically obscure as Cameroon, where else was it reaching?” To be blunt, the answer is, “everywhere.” On the books, the usurping Jewish regime has intelligence contacts in Eritrea, Kenya, Malawi, Zaire, Nigeria, Ivory Coast, Egypt and Morocco (42).

Off the books, the list is even more extensive and thus, a brief but precise overview is necessary. Firstly, it must be understood that even America’s policies towards Africa, in fact, its entire geopolitical network of stratagems for the continent, are shaped by the Zionist regime itself and its plethora of think tanks (43). Secondly, the pestilential plan of senior “Israeli” foreign policy advisor Oded Yinon, “A Strategy For Israel In The 1980s,” a plot discussed on numerous occasions here at Mask of Zion, which features the fragmentation and dissolution of Sudan and Libya as prominent points, has been exported by the Zionist regime across the African continent. “Yinon Africa” is being assisted by the Ugandan dictatorship of Museveni, the corrupt regime in Kenya and the longtime marionette of Zionism, Ethiopia. The objectives of “Yinon Africa” are to balkanize the continent on three lines: ethno-linguistics, skin color and religion. Additionally, the concept of a US Military Central Command in Africa (AFRICOM), was designed and promoted by the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), the same Zionist think tank that produced the infamous “Clean Break” papers (44).

The usurping Jewish
supremacist entity
and the apartheid regime
in South Africa were so
intertwined before the fall
of Pretoria that it appeared
they were a singularity.

The malevolent apartheid regime of South Africa is perhaps where the Jewish supremacist entity’s ties were the strongest. In South Africa, Jews benefited and thrived under the racist regime’s protection, maintaining and strengthening their ties with the Zionist entity. The Board of Deputies of South African Jewry, a major Zionist Lobby front on the African continent, declared “neutrality” in regards to apartheid so Jewish interests weren’t compromised. The “Israeli” security establishment saw the relationship with South Africa so vital in fact that, it actually believed the ties saved the Jewish “state” from extinction. The Zionist entity didn’t just provide a plethora of arms to the apartheid regime, it “created the South African arms industry.” Zionist occupation officers also assisted Pretoria with its operations (read: atrocities) in Angola and, from the illegal Jews-only colony of Kibbutz Beit Alfa, “Israel” developed a profitable industry selling anti-riot vehicles to the apartheid regime. Most astoundingly, Zionism provided South Africa with nuclear technology and expertise, helping it build its own miniature nuclear arsenal (45). Needless to say, every drop of South African blood spilled by the apartheid regime, especially in its last days, is on the hands of “Israel.”

Speaking of Angola, where the Zionist entity was active with South African forces, it should be mentioned that Angolan warlord Jonas Savimbi, the seemingly eternal darling puppet of America’s Jewish Lobby, the neoconservative establishment and “Israel,” was assassinated by Zionist special forces when he no longer served a purpose (46).

Nowhere has the usurping and criminal Zionist entity been more successful in executing destruction than Sudan, a prime target of the Yinon Plan in its past and current incarnations. Oil-rich Sudan has been cracked in half, its unity split and destroyed. The Zionist dragon’s military-intelligence apparatuses designed this balkanization, instigated it, funded the players and from Uganda to Ethiopia, it still maintains agents and assets to uphold the new fragmented Sudanese status quo. “Israel” has already entered the new, fabricated nation-state of ‘South Sudan.’ The deceptive and dangerous IsraAID, backed by Zionist Lobby organizations like the American Jewish Committee and United Jewish Appeal, is on the ground. The newly-created Zionist puppet state has opened its doors to “Israeli” companies to do business in the fields of agriculture, infrastructure, security and medicine, business worth hundreds of millions of dollars. South Sudan views this gesture as gratitude for the Zionist dragon’s committed military and intelligence support to its ‘rebellion.’ And now, to make the relationship between South Sudan and Zionism globally legitimate, full diplomatic relations have been established between the two entities so Tel Aviv can officially take control of South Sudan’s oil-rich economy (47).

“Israel” has been exceedingly active in Ethiopia for decades upon decades but 1990 is where relations hit new peaks. The Zionist regime fueled the Ethiopian Civil War as a testing ground for what it could do with its real enemies, Iraq, Syria and Iran. “Israel” supplied the regime of war criminal and collaborator Mengistu Haile Mariam with cluster bombs, several hundred IOF military trainers to guide the Ethiopian Army, 150,000 bolt-action rifles and an unknown number of its patented “Uzi” machine gun (48). The assistance has continued under the rule of Ethiopian Prime Minister and horrific human rights abuser Meles Zenawi Asres, in power since the fall of Mariam, with the most recent development being the purchase of murderous drones from the “Israeli” firm, Bluebird (49).

Kenya and the Jewish
“state” are united in the
Zionist war against the
people of occupied Somalia.

Kenya has been dear to the heart of the Jewish “state” since its assistance to Mossad and Aman during Operation Entebbe (50). In late November, the Kenyan regime signed a security pact that would have “Israeli” security consultants sent to the East African nation to govern its assault against the Islamic Resistance of occupied Somalia, Al-Shabab. The Somali Resistance assailed the Kenyan regime for the traitorous move, slamming the deal as an attack on Islam (51). The Zionist entity has provided Kenya with weapons in the past and this pact will significantly expand the existent ties, which is promising for “Israeli” arms firms; as usual, the innocent civilians already being butchered in the Zionist proxy war are of no concern to the Jewish “state” (52), considering that the civilians are of African origin and therefore “cursed” in Zionist eyes.

The “Israel”-Kenya dirty deal is already “bearing fruit,” as Kenya has allowed the usurping Jewish entity to house 5 drones in a Kenyan military base on the border with Somalia in exchange for a stash of heavy weaponry and 13 “Israeli” military advisors making their home in Kenya. The Zionist drones have illegally taken to the skies in Somalia and launched hellish missile attacks, with the latest one murdering at least 17 innocents and wounding more than 60 others (53). A 53-year old IAF engineer named Hanoch Miller, who founded a defense firm called Radom Aviation which has worked with “Israeli” Aerospace Industries, has been caught attempting to smuggle weapons to the pathetic puppet regime in Somalia, which is fully complicit in the crimes against the Somali people carried out by the US-backed UN-AU occupation. Though Miller appears to be acting independently, this is highly suspect due to his elite status in the IAF and the fact that the Zionist entity wants to establish relations with the regime (54). Only because of the steadfast Resistance of Al-Shabab has Somalia not been colonized, but it is indeed in the sights of the Merhav Group of “Israel,” a powerful Mossad-run consortium headed by elite Mossad agent Yosef A. Maiman that has already taken over the energy interests of occupied Afghanistan (55).





Libyan leader Muammar al-Qadhdhafi,
June 1942 – October 20th, 2011;
murdered in a Zionist conspiracy
to fragment Libya.



Libyan leader Muammar al-Qadhdhafi, a revolutionary and four-decade resistor of Zionism and Western domination loved dearly by his people, is dead. In an operation led by NATO and its rebels, Qadhdhafi was sodomized and tortured before he was murdered. The invasion, which took place on the Jewish revenge holiday of Purim, like Iraq before it, was designed by the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI), the renamed Jewish-Zionist “Cabal” once known as the Project for a New American Century, and the despicable lies of “human rights violations” and “impending genocide” used by the Zionist media to sell the invasion to the world were generated by UN Watch, a Zionist affiliate of AIPAC’s foreign policy wing, the American Jewish Committee, and headed by “Israeli” citizen Hillel Neuer.

Another African revolutionary life that “Israel” ended was that of Mehdi Ben Barka, routinely described as the “Moroccan Che Guevara” and, “the Frantz Fanon of Morocco.” The Zionist entity’s Mossad kidnaped the great revolutionary theoretician and murdered him in cold blood (58).



After penetrating the
security forces of Nigeria,
the Zionist entity’s Mossad,
with the help of the CIA, is
tearing the oil-rich West African
nation apart.



Nigeria as of late has been rocked by an unrelenting campaign of violent car bombings, including a horrific attack on Christmas Day, which the Zionist media blames on an Islamic group known throughout the capital of Abuja and other cities for its social services, Boko Haram. Nigerian Muslims view the attacks as a means of instigating a religious war to divide the country on ethno-sectarian lines (59), as per one of the directives of “Yinon Africa,” and Nigerian Muslims also reject the idea that Boko Haram is behind the sophisticated attacks, saying it is far beyond their scope and antithetical to their agenda. They say that Boko Haram has become a “boogeyman” used by the Goodluck Jonathan regime to obtain Western grants (60). It is not by luck of any sort that the bombings in Nigeria began right around the same time that the Jonathan regime brought in a team of Mossad and CIA operatives, overseen by “Israeli” Ambassador to Nigeria Moshe Ram, to probe (read: run) its security services (61). The Zionist entity is attempting to break up Nigeria using the same successful methods it used in Sudan and it couldn’t be any clearer.

“Israeli” activity has even been found as far as the tiny island state of Madagascar, where an “illegal commando unit” of Zionist mercenaries led by 60-year old Joseph Akiva from the illegal Jewish settlement of Netanya were involved in a savage crackdown that left dozens of protesters dead. Akiva and his band of goons were suppressing rivals of former Madagascar President Marc Ravalomanana. Despite business interests on the Indian Ocean island involving construction, Akiva has been extradited back to occupied Palestine for his murderous criminal activity (62).

One of the most unknown examples of Zionist puppetry in Africa was “Emperor” of the Central African Republic, Jean-Bédel Bokassa. The closest friend of the megalomaniacal Bokassa was one of the usurping Jewish entity’s “famous generals,” General Shmuel Gonen-Gorodish. The “Israeli” general, in addition to his military and security advice, built up the public relations of Bokassa throughout the globe. Gonen-Gorodish also embezzled large amounts of taxes and customs from the state treasury. Though their relationship didn’t last long, when a military coup ousted Bokassa from power, Gonen-Gorodish helped him flee to the Ivory Coast, where, ironically enough, the luxury hotels, palaces of the rulers and monopolistic companies were all built with the close assistance of the private firms and racist Histadrut of the Zionist entity (63).

The coastal West African nation of Sierra Leone has been pillaged by some of the most vile elements of International Jewry. From the Brooklyn neighborhood of Brighton Beach, the small, troubled and diamond-rich Sierra Leone was “virtually run” by Marat Balagula, the Ukranian-Jewish mob boss of the most powerful criminal organization on earth, the Red Mafiya. Sierra Leone’s president, Joseph Momoh, didn’t have any problem with the Jewish syndicate setting up global smuggling and money laundering operations in Freetown because Balagula’s associates, in return, bankrolled Momoh’s 1985 presidential campaign. The Jewish ultra-gangster’s main contact in Sierra Leone was a Mossad agent named Shabtai Kalmanovitch, who trained Momoh’s presidential guard and assisted in the crushing of an attempted coup in 1986. Balagula and Kalmanovitch were introduced by Rabbi Ronald Greenwald, a frontman for the interests of Marc Rich (64), the famous billionaire Jewish criminal pardoned by Bill Clinton. This revelation shows a clear nexus between the “Israeli” entity and organized crime, united in the ancient Jewish hatred of the Black man, working together for the furtherance of Jewish interests.



Dan Gertler:
the Chabadnik
Zionist and Jewish
“merchant of death”
responsible for
drowning the Congo
in blood.



In the Congo, where a catastrophic genocide has been occurring since 1996, in which up to 10 million people have died at a maddening rate of 1,500 a day, the profiteers of this downright insidious humanitarian disaster are almost exclusively Jewish and intimately linked to the larger network of international Zionism has been responsible for every major conflict of the last century. Led by Dan Gertler, the grandson of Moshe Schnitzer, an Irgun terrorist known throughout the Zionist entity as “Mr. Diamond” and for founding the “Israel” Diamond Exchange in Tel Aviv in 1960, which today brings the usurping regime $14 billion annually in blood business, there is a Jewish-Zionist network in the Congo so interlocked, so powerful and so domineering, that it can truly make one’s head spin (65).

Gertler, a member of the influential Chabad Lubavitch supremacist gangster cult and guided by Rabbi Chaim Yaakov Leibovitch, is in bed with Jewish diamond dynasties that include the families of Templesman, Oppenheimer, Mendell, Blattner, Hertzov and Steinmetz, his main partner. The Chabadnik criminal bought off the Congolese government in exchange for high-level “Israeli” defense and intelligence assistance. The endeavors of Gertler and Beny Steinmetz, one of the richest Jews in the Zionist entity, have proliferated and today, they are have a monopoly over Congo’s diamonds, a dominant stake in Congo’s copper and the largest cobalt-mining company in the world. And all of this blood money ties into Jewish organized crime, “Israeli” arms dealers, multiple Chabad houses and the Zionist occupation itself all the way up to Netanyahu’s office (65). Gertler, a Jewish supremacist of the highest order, revels in sucking the Congo’s blood and he’s so sadistically thirsty for it, he just won’t stop his criminality until there is nothing left but millions more dead.

If the late Mehdi Ben Barka was the “Moroccan Che Guevara,” then Thomas Isidore Noël Sankara, the Burkinabé revolutionary, Pan-Africanist and righteous leader of Burkina Faso from 1983-1987, was certainly the “Che Guevara of Africa.” Sankara was known for his incorruptibility and radical (and successful) policies that included land reform, women’s rights, literacy promotion, education, famine prevention, resource nationalization, anti-neoliberalism, anti-Zionism, anti-imperialism, public health care, social justice and legal punishment for all previous oppressors, colonialist and collaborator alike. Thomas Sankara was nothing short of remarkable. Unfortunately however, his extraordinary and pristine life came to an end on October 15th, 1987, when he was overthrown and executed in a coup d’état by incumbent Burkinabé president, Blaise Compaoré. It has been known, for quite some time, rather undisputably in all actuality, that French intelligence and the CIA aided the coup, but there is yet another player that isn’t discussed.

Not only has the usurping Zionist entity’s Foreign Affairs Ministry described Burkina Faso as “one of ‘Israel’s’ most loyal friends in Africa (66),” but Blaise Compaoré is an honorary member of The International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation (67), a known front for the usurping Jewish regime’s Mossad in which Yosef A. Maiman, the aforesaid Mossad agent who runs the Merhav Group of “Israel” consortium that is currently targeting Somalia, sits on the Board of Directors (68). The International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation was founded by Argentine Jewish supremacist Baruch Tenembaum, a devoted Talmudist, Kabbalist and Zionist who made it his life’s work to undermine Christianity (69). The fact that Compaoré belongs to such an organization is damning; he is a Mossad asset and has been one from the moment that he sold his soul and Burkina Faso to the enemies of Thomas Sankara. Moreover, in a startling admission from former French Foreign Minister Roland Dumas, it is now known that French intelligence is compromised and has been so for some time; the Zionist entity controls it (70). This is yet another damning piece of evidence that Thomas Sankara was indeed a martyr made so by Zionism.



Burkinabé hero Thomas Sankara,
December 21, 1949 – October 15, 1987;
martyred by agents of the
Jewish Power Matrix.



The fallen Burkinabé hero’s widow, Mariam Sankara, declared with her head held high, “What remains above all of my husband is his integrity.” Indeed. And just one week before Mossad asset Compaoré led the coup against him which would result in his untimely death at the tender and untimely age of 36, Thomas would famously state, “While revolutionaries as individuals can be murdered, you cannot kill ideas (71).” Indeed again.

The ideas of Thomas Sankara have not died; they are more alive now than ever before, in the hearts of the Islamic Resistance of Somalia and the Libyan Green Resistance fighting Zionist-designed occupations of their ravaged homelands, and in the streets of Tunisia, Egypt and Morocco, fighting counterrevolutions and repressive, pro-“Israel” dictatorships. What the people of Africa, Black and Arab, Christian and Muslim, and everything in between, must know, is that the Zionist entity, inspired by a primordial Jewish supremacist ideology, has no interest in your land except to exploit it, and exploit you. Zionism is a cancer that infests, infects and destroys everything in its path. But like any other cancer, it can be counteracted and cut out, so it never returns.

O’ Africa! Cut out the Zionist cancer from your midst. Cut it out like a knife to flesh and vow never to mix with it again. It is what Sankara would have wanted. It is what Qadhdhafi would have wanted. It is what Mehdi Ben Barka would have wanted. It is the right thing to do; the just thing, for all of the martyrs of the Transatlantic Slave Trade. For Rwanda. For the Congo. For Burkina Faso. For Somalia. For Zimbabwe. For Uganda. For anyone and everyone who has suffered at the hands of the usurping Jewish entity; to all oppressed people from Africa to what lies beyond its beautiful and ancient borders, heed the call: cut out the Zionist infestation before it is too late. Cut it out before you wake up one morning to the cruel jackboot of Jewish cultural imperialism stepping on your soul, with no Fela Kuti to remind you of the “Zombie” that now personifies your very existence.

~ The End ~

Sources:

(1) Judaism Discovered: A Study Of The Anti-Biblical Religion Of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition And Deceit; Chapter – The Rabbinic Texts: The Most Virulent Source Of Anti-Black Racism In The West, Pages 505-506 by Professor Michael A. Hoffman II, Independent History and Research

(2) Judaism Discovered: A Study Of The Anti-Biblical Religion Of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition And Deceit; Chapter – Maimonides: Premier Anti-Black Racist, Page 500 by Professor Michael A. Hoffman II, Independent History and Research

(3) Judaism Discovered: A Study Of The Anti-Biblical Religion Of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition And Deceit; Chapter – The Rabbinic Texts: The Most Virulent Source Of Anti-Black Racism In The West, Pages 510-513 by Professor Michael A. Hoffman II, Independent History and Research

(4) Why Do So Many Jews Hate Black People? by Adam Bilzerian, The Bilzerian Report

(5) Rothschild And Freshfield Founders Linked To Slavery by Carola Hoyos, The Financial Times

(6) The House Of Rothschild: Money’s Prophets 1798-1848; Chapter Two: The Elector’s Treasure – The Origins Of A Myth, Mayer Amschel’s Legacy, Page 74 by Niall Ferguson, Penguin (Non-Classics)

(7) The New Babylon: Those Who Reign Supreme – A Panoramic Overview Of The Historical, Religious And Economic Origins Of The New World Order; Chapter Five – The Reign Of The House Of Rothschild: The Framework For A Global Jewish Imperium, Pages 119-124 by Michael Collins Piper, American Free Press

(8) Judaism Discovered: A Study Of The Anti-Biblical Religion Of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition And Deceit; Chapter – The Inferiority Of Gentiles, Page 359 by Professor Michael A. Hoffman II, Independent History and Research

(9) The House of Rothschild Volume 2: The World’s Banker 1849-1999; Chapter Eleven: The Risks And Returns Of Empire (1885-1902); Section – Rhodes And The Rothschilds, Pages 356-358 by Niall Ferguson, Penguin (Non-Classics)

(10) In Face Of Desperate African Poverty, Ruth Feigenbaum Provides A Beacon Of Hope by Suzanne Belling, Jewish Telegraph Agency

(11) Ways To Give: Gifts In Kind Donating Goods: Corporate Donors: What Our Donors Say by World Jewish Relief

(12) About Us: About Our Partners by World Jewish Relief

(13) Ruth Feigenbaum – Bulawayo’s Unsung Heroine 2006 by African Jewish Congress

(14) Mission Statement by African Jewish Congress

(15) Violence Reduces Zimbabwe Jewish Community by Steve Lipman, The Jewish Week

(16) Ahad Ha-Am: Leader Of Cultural Zionism, Early Zionist Philosopher by Rabbi Louis Jacobs, My Jewish Learning

(17) The Tribal Nexus: Zionists And “Anti-Zionists” Unite To Ensure The Survival Of “Israel” by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(18) Zimbabwe: We Will Supply Iran With Uranium For Its Nuclear Program by Haaretz

(19) Who’s To Blame For Zimbabwe’s Tragedy? by Ghali Hassan, Counter Currents

(20) Zimbabwe: Jewish Groups Lash Out At Mugabe by All Africa

(21) George Soros To Give $100 Million To Human Rights Watch by Human Rights Watch

(22) Blood Stones, Or Just A Rough Cut? by Shay Fogelman, Haaretz

(23) Israel’s Blood Diamonds by Seán Clinton, The Electronic Intifada

(24) Israeli Pilot Pleads Not Guilty To Diamond Possession by Zimbabwe Papers’ The Herald

(25) Israel’s Global Role: Weapons For Repression; Section – On The African Continent, Page 26 by Professor Israel Shahak, The Association of Arab-American University Graduates

(26) Zimbabwe: Who’s Behind Mugabe’s Ill-Health Reports? by Dumisani Muleya, All Africa

(27) ‘Save Darfur’ Funds Israeli Settlements by Rehmat’s World

(28) KONY 2012: Youth Movement Promotes US Military Presence In Central Africa by Nile Bowie, Empire Strikes Black

(29) New Video Shows Kony 2012 Creator Jason Russell’s Naked Meltdown Close-Up (VIDEO) by Aliyah Shahid and Philip Caulfield, The New York Daily News

(30) Wikileaks: Kony 2012 Creators Spied For Uganda by Russia Today

(31) Cross Cutting Programs: Transition Initiatives: Country Programs: Uganda: USAID/OTI Uganda Quarterly Report, January – March 2009 by USAID

(32) USAID Goes To School: Instruction Or Intelligence? by Faten Elhajj, Al-Akhbar English

(33) Conflict, Gender And Human Rights: Lessons Learned From The Field by Donald K. Steinberg, The Joan B. Kroc Institute For Peace and Justice

(34) Rwanda: The Shame Of Donald Steinberg by Iain Dale, Iain Dale’s Diary

(35) What Are The Former Mossad Chief’s Business Ties To Uganda? by Barak Ravid, Haaretz

(36) Israeli-Ugandan Relations In The Time Of Idi Admin by Dr. Ayre Oded, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs

(37) British Document: Israel Initiated Entebbe Hijack by Ynet

(38) Barak Unfazed By Criticism From Tanzania by Gil Hoffman, The Jerusalem Post

(39) Engel Goes For The Gold – And The Copper And Nickel – In Tanzania by Michael Rochvarger, Haaretz

(40) Israel’s Relations With The Third World (1948-2008) by Benyamin Neuberger, The S. Daniel Abraham Center for International and Regional Studies

(41) Israeli Officer Killed In Cameroon by Press TV

(42) Open Secrets: Israeli Nuclear And Foreign Policies; Chapter 5: Israeli Foreign Policy After The Oslo Accord, 1 November 1993, Page 70 by Professor Israel Shahak, Pluto Press

(43) America’s Conquest Of Africa: The Roles Of France And Israel; Introduction By Cynthia McKinney by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya and Julien Teil, Global Research

(44) Targeting Of Christian Syrians And Black Libyans: The “Clash Of Civilizations” Is On The March by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, Voltaire Net

(45) Brothers In Arms – Israel’s Secret Pact With Pretoria by Chris McGreal, The Guardian

(46) ‘Dogs Of War’ Ban Will Rob British Army Of Vital Frontline Soldiers by Fred Bridgland and Michael Evans, The Times (UK)

(47) PSYWAR: The Fake Fall Of Tripoli And The Zionist Dragon’s Butchery Across Palestine II by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(48) Israelis Widening Role In Ethiopian by Jane Perlez, The New York Times

(49) Ethiopian Army To Get Bluebird UAVs by Arie Egozi, Flight Global

(50) Israel’s Secret Wars: A History Of Israel’s Intelligence Services; Chapter 10: Interregnum With Peace: 1974-80, Section – Rescue At Entebbe, Pages 339-342, by Ian Black and Benny Morris, Grove Press

(51) Israel Targets East Africa With Kenya Security Pact by Brian Dabbs, World Politics Review

(52) Unpacking The Israel-Kenya Deal To Help Wage War On Somalia by Alex Kane, Mondoweiss

(53) Israeli Terror Drones Kill 17 In Somalia by Press TV

(54) U.S. Court Indicts Israeli Suspected Of Arms Trade With Somalia by Yossi Melman and Barak Ravid, Haaretz

(55) Syria Under Fire: Zionist Destabilization Hits Critical Mass by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(56) The Case Of Uri Avnery II: Hasbara, Supremacism And The Future Of Solidarity by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(57) Syria: Zionist Mobilization Kicks Into High Gear by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(58) Israel’s Global Role: Weapons For Repression; Section – On The African Continent, Page 22 by Professor Israel Shahak, The Association of Arab-American University Graduates

(59) Nigeria: ‘Christmas Day Bombings Were Designed To Cause Religious Wars’ – Muslim Group by Mohammad Shosanya, All Africa

(60) Nigeria: The Spreading Northern Insurgency by The Economist

(61) Boko Haram: MOSSAD, CIA To Probe Nigerian Security Agencies by Sam Popoola, The Moment (Nigeria)

(62) Madagascar Convicts, Expels Israeli Over Mercenary Plot by Ynet

(63) Israel’s Global Role: Weapons For Repression; Section – On The African Continent, Pages 23-24 by Professor Israel Shahak, The Association of Arab-American University Graduates

(64) Red Mafiya: How The Russian Mob Has Invaded America; Chapter 3: Brighton Beach Goodfellas, Pages 57-59 by Robert I. Friedman, Little, Brown and Company

(65) Gertler’s Bling Bang Torah Gang: Israel And The Ongoing Holocaust In Congo (Part 1) by Keith Harmon Snow, Dissident Voice

(66) Israel Sends Aid To Flood-Stricken Burkina Faso by The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs

(67) Members Of The Roncalli Committee: Honorary Members by The International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation

(68) About Us: Board Of Directors by The International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation

(69) Baruch Tenembaum: Biography by The International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation

(70) Former French FM: Israel Controls French Intelligence, Lobby Pressures US President by Ahlul Bayt News Agency

(71) Burkina Faso Salutes “Africa’s Che” Thomas Sankara by Mathieu Bonkoungou, Reuters

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

The Zionist Infestation Of Africa: Zimbabwe To Uganda, Congo To Somalia And Beyond

Africa has been infiltrated
and infested by international
Zionism; its resources
are being bled dry by a guild
of Jewish criminals.
(graphic by Skulz Fontaine)

by Jonathan Azaziah

It isn’t matter of debate, on any level, that historically, Africa has been the most tormented and tortured of the planet’s continents and regions. Ravaged by centuries of colonialism and its bastard child, the Transatlantic Slave Trade, imperialism, civil wars instigated by foreign intelligence agencies, the plundering of natural resources and faux “humanitarian” interventions en masse, it seems that Africa just cannot find the salaam it undeniably and screamingly deserves. Much has been written about Africa’s plight being a product of Western aggression and Western racism but this is only a partial truth, as is so often the case when a discussion of world events and world history is initiated in the modern era of media domination, manipulation and disinformation. There are hidden hands behind every bit of genocide and suffering in Africa, past and present alike.

In the groundbreaking works The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews: Volume One, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews: Volume Two – How Jews Gained Control of the Black American Economy and Jews Selling Blacks: Slave Sale Advertising by American Jews, the Historical Research Department of the Nation of Islam, based 100% on Jewish (oftentimes rabbinical) and philo-Semitic sources, unequivocally demonstrates that the torturous, inhuman and genocidal Transatlantic Slave Trade was an endeavor dominated by Jews, going back to the very beginnings of it in Brazil and Surinam. Despite a systematic smear campaign still going on to this day, the Jewish-Zionist Power Configuration has failed miserably in refuting the scholarly volumes because of the meticulous sourcing. What makes this revelation all the more intriguing, as well as disturbing, is that this hegemony wasn’t only material and physical, with Jews operating as both slave owners and slave traders; it was also ideological, with Jews passing down their dehumanizing religious beliefs to their Anglo partners in human misery.

The Talmud:
Judaism’s holiest book,
where anti-Gentile hatred is emphatic;
it is here where the anti-African
fable known as the “Curse of
Ham” was born.

In the Jewish religion, as ordained by the Babylonian Talmud, Blacks are eternally cursed through the channel known as “The Curse of Ham.” Though the curse originated in Chapter 9 of Genesis in the Bible, no racial identity was applied to Ham, son of the prophet Noah, and there was certainly no anti-Black prejudice. The racist origins of The Curse of Ham originated within the ‘wise’ rabbinic pages of the Talmud, which damned Blacks to an infinite existence of enslavement. Stated the rabbis, “Ham is told by his outraged father that, because you have abused me in the darkness of night, your children shall be born black and ugly; because you have twisted your head to cause me embarrassment, they shall have kinky hair and red eyes; because your lips jested at my expense theirs shall swell; and because you neglected my nakedness, they shall go naked (1).” Moses Maimonides, Judaism’s most celebrated rabbinic ‘sage,’ has written that Blacks are “irrational animals” who are “below mankind but above monkeys (2).”

Maimonides’ views are central to the overall Jewish view of Black people, as his name among Jews is an infallible and holy one. Talmudic rabbis have deepened The Curse of Ham over time, attributing bestiality as a regular engagement among Blacks, concocting depraved sexual fantasies of Ham fornicating with dogs and ravens and thus, having his skin damned with even more blackness for his perversion (3). Sick would be an understatement; demented wouldn’t even begin the description. And when the usurping Zionist regime’s policies towards Ethiopian Jews are examined in depth, and they are nothing short of emphatically deplorable, as well as Jewish discrimination against Blacks in the United States due to the disproportionate Jewish accumulation of wealth (4), it is as clear as the sky is dark when the sun falls that these hideous Talmudic beliefs are very much intact today, in the main blocs of Jewish life.

The Rothschild family, the infamous and monstrously powerful Jewish dynasty of bankers, socialites and philanthropists who are rightly considered to be the godfathers of the criminal Zionist entity, are also linked to profiting from the Transatlantic Slave Trade (5). The Rothschild family was also fervently Talmudist, a tradition dating back to the family’s grandsire, Mayer Amschel himself, who was described by one S.J. Cohen in an unofficial, albeit accurate and authoritative biography of the Jewish financier entitled, “The Exemplary Life of The Immortal Banker Mr. Mayer Amschel Rothschild,” as a “zealous believer in the Talmud and chose it alone as the guiding principle of all his actions (6).” Therefore, it shouldn’t be one bit astonishing that the Rothschild family would take part in such a cruel, murderous practice as slavery, as their Jewish beliefs dictated to them that it was perfectly okay to do so; their halfwit, nonsensical apologies notwithstanding. The Rothschild dynasty’s beliefs are also intrinsic to the spread of British and French colonialism throughout the African continent.

The House of Rothschild:
Talmudist Jewish banking
dynasty that financed the
colonial rape of Africa.

As the courageous polemical poet and hero Ezra Pound once said, “Until you know who has lent what to whom, you know nothing whatever of politics, you know nothing whatever of history, you know nothing of international wrangles.” The British and French governments would have not have carried out and could not have carried out their blood-soaked colonial adventures in Africa without an elephantine amount of money, which they indeed did receive from their central banks in London and Paris respectively, as is properly acknowledged by history. What isn’t discussed or dare it even be said, what is ignored for fear of what lies beneath the surface, is that the these central banks, according to a cornucopia of Jewish sources, were under Rothschild dominion, with James Mayer in Paris and Nathan Mayer, described frequently in his time as “King of the Jews,” in London. Millionaires of Jewish extraction were very much the power of France’s financial scene and all of them were surrogates of the House of Rothschild. Jews of socialist, imperialist and republican political backgrounds all worked for the same cause: the furtherance of Rothschild power. As for Britain, the vast majority of the imperial power’s financial transactions were handled by the Rothschild dynasty (7).

To be clear, the House of Rothschild did not have a mere lackadaisical connection to colonial imperialism, as if they were a fantastical caricature of financial greed, sitting in the lap of luxury while their “money worked for them.” These were Jewish fanatics who sincerely believed in subjugating the planet according to their tribal holy books, plundering the wealth of the goyim as they were meant to do as “God’s chosen people,” as confirmed so hatefully and vividly by this Babylonian Talmud excerpt, BT Baba Bathra 54b, “Property of gentiles is like the desert; whoever among the Jews gets there first, owns it (8).” The Rothschilds were the active disseminators of colonialism and imperialism and there is no clearer evidence of this than Cecil Rhodes, perhaps the most famous advocate of British world domination and considered to be a pioneer of the British colonial enterprise. This assessment however is quite deceptive as since the early 1880s, Cecil Rhodes was nothing but a proxy for the Rothschild family, who had a “substantial financial hold” over him. Rhodes, who with Rothschild capital established supremacy over the African diamond trade, reported directly to Nathan Mayer himself (9).

It was the Rothschild frontman Cecil Rhodes who, in accordance with the hegemonic plans of his Talmudist masters, established the genocidal colony of Rhodesia, just north of South Africa, setting off a century of tumultuous conflict and unnecessary bloodshed. Rhodesia would go from colony of the Rothschild Empire, to the sadistic apartheid regime of Ian Smith from 1965-1980, to the nation known today as Zimbabwe, and it is here, where the introduction will end and the study shall begin. The Jewish exploitation of Africa has not ended; it has simply changed faces from the Talmudic financial expansionism of the House of Rothschild to the Zionism of the usurping Jewish entity in Palestine.

Ruth Feigenbaum and Rabbi
Moshe Silberhaft: Zionist agents
attempting to impose Jewish
cultural imperialism on Zimbabwe.

Infiltrated Zimbabwe: Cultural Zionism Spreads Under The Guise Of “Humanitarianism”

On March 1st, 2012, a curious article appeared in the Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA), the self-described “Global News Service of the Jewish People,” entitled, “In face of desperate African poverty, Ruth Feigenbaum provides a beacon of hope (10).” Feigenbaum, according to the JTA, became involved in human rights activities in Zimbabwe after her gardener (read: servant) was diagnosed with HIV and subsequently passed away three days later. The entire ordeal “deeply upset” Feigenbaum. Described as a “major player” in Zimbabwe, Feigenbaum used her “international Jewish connections” to build up charities inside Bulawayo, Zimbabwe’s second largest city.

One such group that assisted her was the World Jewish Relief of London, an organization with a heavy hand in Africa and funded by a who’s who of Zionist consulting firms and Jewish fashion magnates including, but by no means limited to, Marks and Spencer, PO Ltd and Paula Ohrenstein Ltd, Lucy Wernick and Associates, Barry Finer, Majesta Ltd and the Jacobson Group (11). Some of the World Jewish Relief of London’s notable partners are B’nai B’rith, the institution of exclusively Jewish Freemasonry that the Zionist spy nest known as the Anti-Defamation League is intrinsically attached to, the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, a group originally founded as a distribution channel for funds used in the Jewish-Zionist plot to steal Palestine, Lyceum Shaalavim, an Orthodox Jewish school that specializes in Talmudist teachings and the Jewish Forum of Ukraine, a group tied to Zionist fundraising groups throughout the Eastern European nation (12).

Apart from the alarming connections of the World Jewish Relief of London to the international Zionist criminal network and the racist core of Orthodox Jewry, the real reason why Feigenbaum is bouncing around Zimbabwe is revealed by her words, and it isn’t “humanitarianism.” Feigenbaum, referring to Zimbabwean children that she works with, said, “They have learned something about Jews and Judaism from me (10).” Assuredly, what these precious, innocent and unsuspecting children “learned” wasn’t the Curse of Ham or the teachings of Maimonides.

Furthermore, Feigenbaum was assisted in her efforts by a South African rabbi named Moshe Silberhaft, who provided her with books for the children that she works with and who a library in her community would be named after. The JTA report noted that, “In her work with local Zimbabweans, Feigenbaum has introduced some Jewish teachings. During the library dedication, she had tears in her eyes watching the orphans sing songs in the two main indigenous Zimbabwean languages, Shona and Ndebele, as well as in English and Hebrew.” Feigenbaum also made mention that, “They greet me on every visit with a ‘shalom’ and thank me by saying ‘todah rabah.’ At Pesach time, with the matzah sent to us by Rabbi Moshe, I arrange a third seder so they can learn a little about our customs (10).”

The African Jewish Congress
is an outpost of Zionism that
is vital to “Israeli” hegemony
over the African continent.

What was conspicuously absent from the JTA report, information that confirms who Feigenbaum really is and what her truly sinister intentions are is that she is a member of the African Jewish Congress (13), a Zionist Lobby group which helps African Jews “retain their links with World Jewry” and which maintains organizational goals of “fighting anti-Semitism” and promoting the interests of the usurping Zionist entity. The African Jewish Congress is an affiliate of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies and the World Jewish Congress (14), one of the most powerful Jewish-Zionist groups on the planet. The executive director of the African Jewish Congress is none other than Rabbi Moshe Silberhaft, Feigenbaum’s partner in Zimbabwe, who was rabbinically ordained in occupied al-Quds and is a citizen of the criminal Zionist entity (15). To repeat, Feigenbaum is no “humanitarian,” no “human rights activist”; she is a cultural Zionist imposing cultural Zionism (also known as Jewish cultural imperialism) on a native population.

The legendary Nigerian revolutionary and musical renegade Fela Kuti famously declared that European cultural imperialism was the biggest enemy of the African and was the thing most vital for him to fight against. In this spirit, an addendum should be added that Jewish cultural imperialism (Cultural Zionism) is an enemy just as deadly to the African if not more so due to Jewish religious teachings and Zionist occupation policy (which is rooted in Judaic “wisdom”) both being inherently anti-Black. Cultural Zionism will install in its African victims a brutal cognitive dissonance in which they vehemently despise racism but also love Zionists, despite their abyssal and ancient supremacist beliefs, specifically in regards to the African, who, in their Judaic worldview, is eternally damned to slavery and “blackness” because of the Curse of Ham.

Asher Zvi Hirsch Ginsberg:
Jewish supremacist and
founder of Cultural Zionism.

Cultural Zionism was created and developed by Jewish supremacist and educated Talmudist Ahad Ha’am (real name: Asher Zvi Hirsch Ginsberg), who viewed the criminal Zionist project as a means of founding a “spiritual center for World Jewry (16),” the indigenous Palestinian people be damned. What Africans need to know is that at the very heart of Cultural Zionism is the destruction of everything that is not Jewish for the furtherance of Jewish interests, as evidenced by the “Greater Israel” doctrine (17). Ruth Feigenbaum’s advances in Zimbabwe are merely the beginning of something far more sinister, far more dangerous, like the early Jewish-Zionist settlers in Palestine before her, advancing Jewish cultural imperialism slowly and cunningly.

An integral part of Cultural Zionism is spying and reconnaissance, understanding the indigenous culture before encroaching upon it and destroying it, and fifth columnists for the usurping Zionist entity is exactly what Feigenbaum, Silberhaft and the African Jewish Congress are. It is not coincidental that their activities have heightened at a time not too long after the Zimbabwean government of President Robert Mugabe stood defiantly against international Zionism and its proxies in Washington D.C. and London by vowing to provide the Islamic Republic of Iran with uranium for its peaceful program, despite crippling economic aggression. Indeed, Zimbabwean Foreign Minister Simbarashe Mumbengegwi pointedly declared, “Restrictions against the two countries {Zimbabwe and Iran} are not accidental. Western states follow the approach of sanction towards countries which do not yield to their domination and act against their interest (18).”

The cruel sanctions against the Islamic Revolution are well-known. The Western economic war against Mugabe’s Zimbabwe however is a hidden truth, the root cause of the hardships currently being struggled against by the Zimbabwean people and one that was also deliberately absent from the JTA report on Fiegenbaum and her Zionist “activism.”

From the moment of Zimbabwean independence from the Rothschild Empire, Mugabe, himself imprisoned by the apartheid regime for a decade (1964-1974), initiated a program of land reform aimed at redistributing the land confiscated by the Rhodesian settlers back to their rightful owners: native Zimbabweans. The British government, an agent for Rothschild interests, entered into an agreement with Mugabe that it would take care of the Rhodesian settlers. Typically, it reneged, in a deliberate attempt to break the back of the Zimbabwean government and send the country into chaos. Mugabe, who built excellent programs of national health care and education, resulting in a literacy rate of 95% among indigenous Zimbabweans, the highest in Africa, as compared to an abysmal 39% during the apartheid years, resisted in the name of his people. And as a result of his sincere resistance to the Western plot, the American and British governments, as well as the IMF, an institution dominated by Zionist Jewry, imposed devastating sanctions on his country. The sanctions have prevented the Mugabe government from importing raw materials, laying the agricultural and industrial sectors of Zimbabwe to waste (19).

Robert Mugabe has been
steadfast in defending
his nation from Western
aggression and Jewish
exploitation.

Because of Mugabe’s historical principled stance on Palestine, and his courageous efforts to stop Jewish monopolization of Zimbabwe’s clothing and textile sectors (20), the usurping “Israeli” regime has joined in the economic aggression against the southern African nation of Resistance. The Zionist regime’s Industry, Trade and Labor Ministry, along with the Kimberley Process, an “Israeli”-run forum that fronts as a “human rights” group interested in stopping the flow of blood diamonds onto global markets, and Human Rights Watch, the notorious NGO funded by billionaire Zionist mega criminal George Soros to the tune of $100 million (21), teamed up to punish Zimbabwe for alleged (read: non-existent) human rights abuses and corruption (22).

The utter egregiousness aside, what makes the matter so pathetically farcical and so laughably hypocritical, is that the largest exporter of diamonds in the world is “Israel,” and every diamond it produces is a blood diamond due to the fact that it stands accused of war crimes, crimes against humanity, ethnic cleansing, genocide, apartheid and extrajudicial executions inside and outside of its (ever-expanding) territory. The Zionist entity uses the money it procures from its blood diamonds to fund the criminal 64-year occupation of Palestine (23). And, in a stunning twist of fateful irony, just recently, an “Israeli” pilot named Shmuel Kainan Klein was caught by Zimbabwean immigration officials in an attempt to smuggle diamonds to Tel Aviv (24). The Zionist assault on the Zimbabwean people isn’t a new phenomenon either. While Mugabe was fighting the Rhodesian apartheid regime of Ian Smith, “Israel” was advising it, assisting it and arming it, with its patented “Uzi” machine guns and refurbished US helicopters (25).

With reports abound in the Zionist media about Mugabe’s failing health, all of which, for the record, are false and likely planted by enemy intelligence agencies (26), the African Jewish Congress’ Ruth Feigenbaum still operating and his nation’s relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran gaining more ground with each passing day, it is certain that for the foreseeable future, Zimbabweans will not know peace, as they haven’t since the first day the Rothschild stooge Cecil Rhodes illegally stepped foot on their land.

The Kony2012
campaign just
unbearably reeks
of Zionist propaganda.

A Zionist Plot In Uganda: Kony2012 Sensationalism and Disinformation Galore

On March 5th, 2012, the worldwide web was set ablaze by a glossy, emotional and deceptive video called “Kony2012” about a Central African rebel group known as the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) and its leader Joseph Kony. Produced by a group called Invisible Children, the Kony2012 campaign attracted celebrities from across the (Jewish-run) Hollywood spectrum and garnered major attention from the Zionist media. If these weren’t suspect enough, the red flags were solidified upon examining the campaign poster, which featured Joseph Kony alongside Osama Bin Laden and National Socialist Germany’s Adolf Hitler.

Slamming a leader as “Hitler,” his country as “Germany” and his people as “Nazis” is a common, tiresome, ad hominem and reprehensibly slanderous attack that the Jewish Power Matrix has utilized incessantly since the horrific fall of National Socialism at the hands of the genocidal Allied Axis during WW2, most specifically against the German people themselves, Palestinians and Iraqis. And Osama Bin Laden of course, has been the boogeyman used by international Zionism to justify its ongoing Orwellian “war on terror.” The matter was quite reminiscent of the “Save Darfur” farce, a campaign that began as an exclusive project of the American Jewish community, with hardline Zionist groups like the American Jewish World Service and Jewish Community Relations Council leading the way in the propagandistic assault on the government of Sudan. More than half of the $100 million raised ended up in “Israeli” banks to fund illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank (27).

Kony2012 is no less fraudulent as Joseph Kony is wrongfully depicted as this supremely influential warlord who has built up a massive, murderous army through the widespread physical, psychological and sexual abuse of child soldiers. Nowhere in the video does it mention that Kony’s LRA was originally comprised of the Acholi people, an ethnic group repressed and enslaved by the Rothschild-financed British colonialists. Nor does it mention that the LRA was formed to combat discrimination and resist the military dictatorship of Yoweri Museveni, who receives $45 million yearly from the US government to assist the fight against Al-Shabab, the Islamic Resistance of occupied Somalia. Conveniently, it also doesn’t mention that the LRA hasn’t been active in Uganda or anywhere else in Central Africa since 2006 and Kony himself has been AWOL for some time. The video is a con, pure and simple, and a dangerous one at that, as it attempts to create a pretext (capturing Kony) to justify American military aggression against Uganda and deepen the already-troublesome presence of AFRICOM on the continent (28).

Invisible Children is a
proxy of USAID, the
odious next of spies
and organ of international
Zionism.

Despite all of the hype however, Kony2012 is now in shambles. Jason Russell, co-founder of Invisible Children and the driving force behind the viral video, has brought disgrace to the initiative after melting down in public by swearing and screaming to himself, behaving lasciviously and pounding the sidewalk with both hands, all while being in the nude (29). Moreover, Invisible Children has been caught spying for the brutal Museveni regime and backing US-intelligence-led Ugandan military operations that left scores of innocent men, women and children dead (30). In the most devastating blow, and what is now absolute corroboration of previous analytical deductions that pegged Invisible Children as an organ of the arrogant powers, it has been revealed that the NGO is being funded and supported through the Northern Uganda Transition Initiative of USAID (31), the State Department apparatus so often associated with CIA-type operations and spying, as evidenced most recently by its activities of infiltration in educational institutions across Lebanon (32).

And it is here where the Zionist ball of yarn seriously and uncontrollably unravels. The Deputy Administrator of USAID is Donald Steinberg, a lifetime diplomat who has served in multiple high-level positions in the US government including, most notably, Director for African Affairs at the National Security Council (1994-95) and senior advisor to President Clinton on all African issues, as well as Principal Deputy Director of Policy Planning for the US State Department (2001-2003), where he intimately assisted Secretary of State Colin Powell with the reconstruction of occupied Afghanistan. Steinberg is also a devoted Zionist who has played a key role in maintaining the status quos of the criminal occupations of Palestine and Kashmir through the Zionist-dominated “peace process” and its ugly sister, “conflict resolution (33).”

USAID chief
Donald K.
Steinberg:
lifelong
devotee of
imposing the
Zionist agenda
upon Africa.

Steinberg is hated across the African continent for his role in the Rwandan Genocide, in which he advised the Jewish-run, philo-Semitic, war criminal Clinton administration to ignore the terrible bloodshed that would unfold. Steinberg now serves as Deputy President of the International Crisis Group (34), a mightily influential Zionist think tank founded by neoconservative hawk Morton Abramowitz and the aforementioned George Soros. Despite his “humanitarian credentials,” it is clear from his positions and associates that Steinberg is a top rank agent of the Cultural Zionism project in Africa. And as a commander of the powerful USAID, there is no doubt that Steinberg ensures a policy that grants loans only to those groups who are willing to pursue the Zionist agenda.

Ugandan dictator Yoweri Museveni is also deeply involved with the usurping Zionist regime, hence why he receives tens of millions in aid from the Zionist-occupied United States government, which never compromises “Israeli” interests when in comes to setting up client regimes. He made his first visit to Jewish-occupied Palestine in 2003 when he met with the genocidal mass murderer Prime Minister Ariel Sharon (real name: Ariel Scheinermann) and psychotic hardliner Foreign Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (real name: Benjamin Mileikowsky) for the purpose of securing arms. His most recent visit, in November 2011, with Netanyahu and massacrer of Qana Shimon Peres (real name: Szymon Perski), was in regards to more arms and amplification of economic aid. The meeting was organized by Rafi Eitan, the infamous former Palmach commander and Mossad operations director, who is now setting up business operations in Uganda (undoubtedly for further “Israeli” penetration) with the help of Museveni (35).

It must be stated that it is quite possible, nay, quite highly probable that Yoweri Museveni wouldn’t be in power today if wasn’t for the Zionist entity due to the usurping regime’s intimate involvement in the downfall of former Ugandan leader, the misunderstood and demonized Idi Amin, who reigned from 1971-1979. During the opening months of his presidency, Amin had close ties with the Jewish supremacist entity, forging economic and military alliances with it. “Israeli” military advisors set up training camps for the Ugandan air force and infantry and there were routine meetings between Zionist occupation and Ugandan officials. The Zionist entity sold Amin jets, tanks and guns of all kinds, while its companies became involved in building Uganda’s infrastructure, including houses and roads. In exchange, Amin agreed to assist Zionist efforts to fragment Sudan (36).

After turning against
the usurping Zionist
entity in 1972, Ugandan
leader Idi Amin became
a target that had to be
“dealt with.”

“Israel” however, despite the vast involvement it already had in Uganda, was not living up to the agreements it had made with Amin and he began to look elsewhere in the region for assistance. His breakthrough who came with none other than Muammar al-Qadhdhafi, the fallen Libyan leader who had been a thorn in the side of international Zionism from the very beginning of his reign. Qadhdhafi “berated” Amin for collaborating with Zionism and told him that the assistance was his as long as he promised to end his ties with the occupier of Palestine. Amin agreed and within two weeks, he had already taken measures to remove all Zionist Jews from Uganda and began issuing calls at the UN for “Israel” to be removed as a member and for “Israelis” to be expelled from Palestine back to Britain which he (rightly) viewed as responsible for helping birth the criminal Jewish “state.” He also began actively aiding the Palestinian Resistance. Right on queue, like clockwork, the Zionist media began depicting Amin as an “anti-Semite” and “brutal dictator” who ran a “terror regime” that “murdered hundreds of thousands of Ugandans belonging to tribes that opposed” it (36).

It was the “Entebbe Crisis,” which lasted from June 27th, 1976 to July 4th, 1976, that ultimately led to the disintegration of Idi Amin’s regime, tarnishing his image internationally and weakening him internally. Out of the ashes of what the Zionists would call “Operation Entebbe,” President of Tanzania Julius Nyerere would take action against Idi Amin at a time when he viewed the Ugandan leader and his army as weak. Nyerere would send 40,000 troops into the Ugandan capital of Kampala in April 1979, the culmination of three years of conflict, where the Tanzanian forces would emerge victorious drive Amin into exile (36). What isn’t known about these two events, other than that they are indeed connected, is that the Zionist entity fomented and manipulated both of them.

The “Israeli” internal
security service, Shin Bet,
orchestrated the Entebbe
false flag hijacking
to bring down Idi Amin and
weaken the PLO.

The Entebbe Crisis began when the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) allegedly hijacked a plane in Athens and subsequently flew the plane into Entebbe; 98 persons, most of them “Israeli” Jews, were held hostage. The operation was reported worldwide as an act of terrorism, with Idi Amin being a “state sponsor of terror.” This narrative, like every other narrative of the Jewish-Zionist media, is a lie. In truth, the hijacking was a false flag attacked staged by the “Israeli” internal security service, Shin Bet (or Shabak), who had infiltrated the PFLP and planted “all sorts of wild elements” within the organization’s mix. The intention of the operation, other than to undermine Idi Amin, was to weaken the PLO in the eyes of France and the United States. The crisis came to a close when elite “Israeli” occupation commandos raided Entebbe Airport, bringing the Zionist false flag theater to its closing act and rescuing the hostages. “Israeli” Prime Minister Netanyahu’s brother, Yonatan, died during the raid (37).

Tanzania, led by Julius Nyerere from 1961 until his retirement in 1985, was an “Israeli” client state from the moment of its independence in 1964, establishing uninterrupted security, diplomatic and economic ties (38). Most recently, the Zionist entity has taken a substantial portion of control of Tanzania’s vast mining operations, with the Engelinvest mega corporation of “Israeli” moneyman Jacob Engel taking hold of three mines, and securing dominion over Tanzanian gold, copper, nickel and other metals (39). Nyerere himself was not only an ally of the Jewish occupation regime but a devoted supporter of the Zionist cause, once ridiculously and insultingly declaring that war criminal Golda Meir (real name: Golda Mabovich) was the “mother of Africa.” Nyerere personally (and nonsensically, for that matter) believed that any enemy of the Jews (“Israel”) was an enemy of the Blacks (Africa). The relations between Tanzania and “Israel” were of a special kind and there is no doubt that this was due to the ideological veneration of Nyerere (40), which was highly peculiar for a Third World leader of his stature.

Amin’s heroic intransigence made his removal a prime Zionist objective in Africa, and with these revelations regarding the bond between Tanzania and Zionism now in context, there can be doubt there was an “Israeli” hand in Nyerere’s crippling of Amin and his government. The Ugandan people, now being ruled by the pro-“Israel” dictator Museveni, can only wonder “what if…” in regards to what has transpired since that fateful 1976 summer in Entebbe; “what if…” Amin emerged triumphant over “Israel.”

The tentacles of international
Zionism extend throughout
the globe and deep into the
continent of Africa.

Conclusion: Welcome To Africa, Where Zionist Tentacles Extend Throughout The Continent

On November 23rd 2010, an important story reported in the Hebrew press of the Zionist entity, then picked up by the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Press TV, revealed a rather bothersome development. A retired “Israeli” colonel by the name of Avi Sivan had died in a helicopter crash near Yaounde, the capital of the Central African nation of Cameroon. Sivan was responsible for training the Cameroonian presidential guard and was also the head of the Jewish supremacist entity’s military delegation to Cameroon (41). The question was, “if the Zionist entity’s tentacles in Africa had penetrated a nation as geopolitically obscure as Cameroon, where else was it reaching?” To be blunt, the answer is, “everywhere.” On the books, the usurping Jewish regime has intelligence contacts in Eritrea, Kenya, Malawi, Zaire, Nigeria, Ivory Coast, Egypt and Morocco (42).

Off the books, the list is even more extensive and thus, a brief but precise overview is necessary. Firstly, it must be understood that even America’s policies towards Africa, in fact, its entire geopolitical network of stratagems for the continent, are shaped by the Zionist regime itself and its plethora of think tanks (43). Secondly, the pestilential plan of senior “Israeli” foreign policy advisor Oded Yinon, “A Strategy For Israel In The 1980s,” a plot discussed on numerous occasions here at Mask of Zion, which features the fragmentation and dissolution of Sudan and Libya as prominent points, has been exported by the Zionist regime across the African continent. “Yinon Africa” is being assisted by the Ugandan dictatorship of Museveni, the corrupt regime in Kenya and the longtime marionette of Zionism, Ethiopia. The objectives of “Yinon Africa” are to balkanize the continent on three lines: ethno-linguistics, skin color and religion. Additionally, the concept of a US Military Central Command in Africa (AFRICOM), was designed and promoted by the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), the same Zionist think tank that produced the infamous “Clean Break” papers (44).

The usurping Jewish
supremacist entity
and the apartheid regime
in South Africa were so
intertwined before the fall
of Pretoria that it appeared
they were a singularity.

The malevolent apartheid regime of South Africa is perhaps where the Jewish supremacist entity’s ties were the strongest. In South Africa, Jews benefited and thrived under the racist regime’s protection, maintaining and strengthening their ties with the Zionist entity. The Board of Deputies of South African Jewry, a major Zionist Lobby front on the African continent, declared “neutrality” in regards to apartheid so Jewish interests weren’t compromised. The “Israeli” security establishment saw the relationship with South Africa so vital in fact that, it actually believed the ties saved the Jewish “state” from extinction. The Zionist entity didn’t just provide a plethora of arms to the apartheid regime, it “created the South African arms industry.” Zionist occupation officers also assisted Pretoria with its operations (read: atrocities) in Angola and, from the illegal Jews-only colony of Kibbutz Beit Alfa, “Israel” developed a profitable industry selling anti-riot vehicles to the apartheid regime. Most astoundingly, Zionism provided South Africa with nuclear technology and expertise, helping it build its own miniature nuclear arsenal (45). Needless to say, every drop of South African blood spilled by the apartheid regime, especially in its last days, is on the hands of “Israel.”

Speaking of Angola, where the Zionist entity was active with South African forces, it should be mentioned that Angolan warlord Jonas Savimbi, the seemingly eternal darling puppet of America’s Jewish Lobby, the neoconservative establishment and “Israel,” was assassinated by Zionist special forces when he no longer served a purpose (46).

Nowhere has the usurping and criminal Zionist entity been more successful in executing destruction than Sudan, a prime target of the Yinon Plan in its past and current incarnations. Oil-rich Sudan has been cracked in half, its unity split and destroyed. The Zionist dragon’s military-intelligence apparatuses designed this balkanization, instigated it, funded the players and from Uganda to Ethiopia, it still maintains agents and assets to uphold the new fragmented Sudanese status quo. “Israel” has already entered the new, fabricated nation-state of ‘South Sudan.’ The deceptive and dangerous IsraAID, backed by Zionist Lobby organizations like the American Jewish Committee and United Jewish Appeal, is on the ground. The newly-created Zionist puppet state has opened its doors to “Israeli” companies to do business in the fields of agriculture, infrastructure, security and medicine, business worth hundreds of millions of dollars. South Sudan views this gesture as gratitude for the Zionist dragon’s committed military and intelligence support to its ‘rebellion.’ And now, to make the relationship between South Sudan and Zionism globally legitimate, full diplomatic relations have been established between the two entities so Tel Aviv can officially take control of South Sudan’s oil-rich economy (47).

“Israel” has been exceedingly active in Ethiopia for decades upon decades but 1990 is where relations hit new peaks. The Zionist regime fueled the Ethiopian Civil War as a testing ground for what it could do with its real enemies, Iraq, Syria and Iran. “Israel” supplied the regime of war criminal and collaborator Mengistu Haile Mariam with cluster bombs, several hundred IOF military trainers to guide the Ethiopian Army, 150,000 bolt-action rifles and an unknown number of its patented “Uzi” machine gun (48). The assistance has continued under the rule of Ethiopian Prime Minister and horrific human rights abuser Meles Zenawi Asres, in power since the fall of Mariam, with the most recent development being the purchase of murderous drones from the “Israeli” firm, Bluebird (49).

Kenya and the Jewish
“state” are united in the
Zionist war against the
people of occupied Somalia.

Kenya has been dear to the heart of the Jewish “state” since its assistance to Mossad and Aman during Operation Entebbe (50). In late November, the Kenyan regime signed a security pact that would have “Israeli” security consultants sent to the East African nation to govern its assault against the Islamic Resistance of occupied Somalia, Al-Shabab. The Somali Resistance assailed the Kenyan regime for the traitorous move, slamming the deal as an attack on Islam (51). The Zionist entity has provided Kenya with weapons in the past and this pact will significantly expand the existent ties, which is promising for “Israeli” arms firms; as usual, the innocent civilians already being butchered in the Zionist proxy war are of no concern to the Jewish “state” (52), considering that the civilians are of African origin and therefore “cursed” in Zionist eyes.

The “Israel”-Kenya dirty deal is already “bearing fruit,” as Kenya has allowed the usurping Jewish entity to house 5 drones in a Kenyan military base on the border with Somalia in exchange for a stash of heavy weaponry and 13 “Israeli” military advisors making their home in Kenya. The Zionist drones have illegally taken to the skies in Somalia and launched hellish missile attacks, with the latest one murdering at least 17 innocents and wounding more than 60 others (53). A 53-year old IAF engineer named Hanoch Miller, who founded a defense firm called Radom Aviation which has worked with “Israeli” Aerospace Industries, has been caught attempting to smuggle weapons to the pathetic puppet regime in Somalia, which is fully complicit in the crimes against the Somali people carried out by the US-backed UN-AU occupation. Though Miller appears to be acting independently, this is highly suspect due to his elite status in the IAF and the fact that the Zionist entity wants to establish relations with the regime (54). Only because of the steadfast Resistance of Al-Shabab has Somalia not been colonized, but it is indeed in the sights of the Merhav Group of “Israel,” a powerful Mossad-run consortium headed by elite Mossad agent Yosef A. Maiman that has already taken over the energy interests of occupied Afghanistan (55).





Libyan leader Muammar al-Qadhdhafi,
June 1942 – October 20th, 2011;
murdered in a Zionist conspiracy
to fragment Libya.



Libyan leader Muammar al-Qadhdhafi, a revolutionary and four-decade resistor of Zionism and Western domination loved dearly by his people, is dead. In an operation led by NATO and its rebels, Qadhdhafi was sodomized and tortured before he was murdered. The invasion, which took place on the Jewish revenge holiday of Purim, like Iraq before it, was designed by the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI), the renamed Jewish-Zionist “Cabal” once known as the Project for a New American Century, and the despicable lies of “human rights violations” and “impending genocide” used by the Zionist media to sell the invasion to the world were generated by UN Watch, a Zionist affiliate of AIPAC’s foreign policy wing, the American Jewish Committee, and headed by “Israeli” citizen Hillel Neuer.

Another African revolutionary life that “Israel” ended was that of Mehdi Ben Barka, routinely described as the “Moroccan Che Guevara” and, “the Frantz Fanon of Morocco.” The Zionist entity’s Mossad kidnaped the great revolutionary theoretician and murdered him in cold blood (58).



After penetrating the
security forces of Nigeria,
the Zionist entity’s Mossad,
with the help of the CIA, is
tearing the oil-rich West African
nation apart.



Nigeria as of late has been rocked by an unrelenting campaign of violent car bombings, including a horrific attack on Christmas Day, which the Zionist media blames on an Islamic group known throughout the capital of Abuja and other cities for its social services, Boko Haram. Nigerian Muslims view the attacks as a means of instigating a religious war to divide the country on ethno-sectarian lines (59), as per one of the directives of “Yinon Africa,” and Nigerian Muslims also reject the idea that Boko Haram is behind the sophisticated attacks, saying it is far beyond their scope and antithetical to their agenda. They say that Boko Haram has become a “boogeyman” used by the Goodluck Jonathan regime to obtain Western grants (60). It is not by luck of any sort that the bombings in Nigeria began right around the same time that the Jonathan regime brought in a team of Mossad and CIA operatives, overseen by “Israeli” Ambassador to Nigeria Moshe Ram, to probe (read: run) its security services (61). The Zionist entity is attempting to break up Nigeria using the same successful methods it used in Sudan and it couldn’t be any clearer.

“Israeli” activity has even been found as far as the tiny island state of Madagascar, where an “illegal commando unit” of Zionist mercenaries led by 60-year old Joseph Akiva from the illegal Jewish settlement of Netanya were involved in a savage crackdown that left dozens of protesters dead. Akiva and his band of goons were suppressing rivals of former Madagascar President Marc Ravalomanana. Despite business interests on the Indian Ocean island involving construction, Akiva has been extradited back to occupied Palestine for his murderous criminal activity (62).

One of the most unknown examples of Zionist puppetry in Africa was “Emperor” of the Central African Republic, Jean-Bédel Bokassa. The closest friend of the megalomaniacal Bokassa was one of the usurping Jewish entity’s “famous generals,” General Shmuel Gonen-Gorodish. The “Israeli” general, in addition to his military and security advice, built up the public relations of Bokassa throughout the globe. Gonen-Gorodish also embezzled large amounts of taxes and customs from the state treasury. Though their relationship didn’t last long, when a military coup ousted Bokassa from power, Gonen-Gorodish helped him flee to the Ivory Coast, where, ironically enough, the luxury hotels, palaces of the rulers and monopolistic companies were all built with the close assistance of the private firms and racist Histadrut of the Zionist entity (63).

The coastal West African nation of Sierra Leone has been pillaged by some of the most vile elements of International Jewry. From the Brooklyn neighborhood of Brighton Beach, the small, troubled and diamond-rich Sierra Leone was “virtually run” by Marat Balagula, the Ukranian-Jewish mob boss of the most powerful criminal organization on earth, the Red Mafiya. Sierra Leone’s president, Joseph Momoh, didn’t have any problem with the Jewish syndicate setting up global smuggling and money laundering operations in Freetown because Balagula’s associates, in return, bankrolled Momoh’s 1985 presidential campaign. The Jewish ultra-gangster’s main contact in Sierra Leone was a Mossad agent named Shabtai Kalmanovitch, who trained Momoh’s presidential guard and assisted in the crushing of an attempted coup in 1986. Balagula and Kalmanovitch were introduced by Rabbi Ronald Greenwald, a frontman for the interests of Marc Rich (64), the famous billionaire Jewish criminal pardoned by Bill Clinton. This revelation shows a clear nexus between the “Israeli” entity and organized crime, united in the ancient Jewish hatred of the Black man, working together for the furtherance of Jewish interests.



Dan Gertler:
the Chabadnik
Zionist and Jewish
“merchant of death”
responsible for
drowning the Congo
in blood.



In the Congo, where a catastrophic genocide has been occurring since 1996, in which up to 10 million people have died at a maddening rate of 1,500 a day, the profiteers of this downright insidious humanitarian disaster are almost exclusively Jewish and intimately linked to the larger network of international Zionism has been responsible for every major conflict of the last century. Led by Dan Gertler, the grandson of Moshe Schnitzer, an Irgun terrorist known throughout the Zionist entity as “Mr. Diamond” and for founding the “Israel” Diamond Exchange in Tel Aviv in 1960, which today brings the usurping regime $14 billion annually in blood business, there is a Jewish-Zionist network in the Congo so interlocked, so powerful and so domineering, that it can truly make one’s head spin (65).

Gertler, a member of the influential Chabad Lubavitch supremacist gangster cult and guided by Rabbi Chaim Yaakov Leibovitch, is in bed with Jewish diamond dynasties that include the families of Templesman, Oppenheimer, Mendell, Blattner, Hertzov and Steinmetz, his main partner. The Chabadnik criminal bought off the Congolese government in exchange for high-level “Israeli” defense and intelligence assistance. The endeavors of Gertler and Beny Steinmetz, one of the richest Jews in the Zionist entity, have proliferated and today, they are have a monopoly over Congo’s diamonds, a dominant stake in Congo’s copper and the largest cobalt-mining company in the world. And all of this blood money ties into Jewish organized crime, “Israeli” arms dealers, multiple Chabad houses and the Zionist occupation itself all the way up to Netanyahu’s office (65). Gertler, a Jewish supremacist of the highest order, revels in sucking the Congo’s blood and he’s so sadistically thirsty for it, he just won’t stop his criminality until there is nothing left but millions more dead.

If the late Mehdi Ben Barka was the “Moroccan Che Guevara,” then Thomas Isidore Noël Sankara, the Burkinabé revolutionary, Pan-Africanist and righteous leader of Burkina Faso from 1983-1987, was certainly the “Che Guevara of Africa.” Sankara was known for his incorruptibility and radical (and successful) policies that included land reform, women’s rights, literacy promotion, education, famine prevention, resource nationalization, anti-neoliberalism, anti-Zionism, anti-imperialism, public health care, social justice and legal punishment for all previous oppressors, colonialist and collaborator alike. Thomas Sankara was nothing short of remarkable. Unfortunately however, his extraordinary and pristine life came to an end on October 15th, 1987, when he was overthrown and executed in a coup d’état by incumbent Burkinabé president, Blaise Compaoré. It has been known, for quite some time, rather undisputably in all actuality, that French intelligence and the CIA aided the coup, but there is yet another player that isn’t discussed.

Not only has the usurping Zionist entity’s Foreign Affairs Ministry described Burkina Faso as “one of ‘Israel’s’ most loyal friends in Africa (66),” but Blaise Compaoré is an honorary member of The International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation (67), a known front for the usurping Jewish regime’s Mossad in which Yosef A. Maiman, the aforesaid Mossad agent who runs the Merhav Group of “Israel” consortium that is currently targeting Somalia, sits on the Board of Directors (68). The International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation was founded by Argentine Jewish supremacist Baruch Tenembaum, a devoted Talmudist, Kabbalist and Zionist who made it his life’s work to undermine Christianity (69). The fact that Compaoré belongs to such an organization is damning; he is a Mossad asset and has been one from the moment that he sold his soul and Burkina Faso to the enemies of Thomas Sankara. Moreover, in a startling admission from former French Foreign Minister Roland Dumas, it is now known that French intelligence is compromised and has been so for some time; the Zionist entity controls it (70). This is yet another damning piece of evidence that Thomas Sankara was indeed a martyr made so by Zionism.



Burkinabé hero Thomas Sankara,
December 21, 1949 – October 15, 1987;
martyred by agents of the
Jewish Power Matrix.



The fallen Burkinabé hero’s widow, Mariam Sankara, declared with her head held high, “What remains above all of my husband is his integrity.” Indeed. And just one week before Mossad asset Compaoré led the coup against him which would result in his untimely death at the tender and untimely age of 36, Thomas would famously state, “While revolutionaries as individuals can be murdered, you cannot kill ideas (71).” Indeed again.

The ideas of Thomas Sankara have not died; they are more alive now than ever before, in the hearts of the Islamic Resistance of Somalia and the Libyan Green Resistance fighting Zionist-designed occupations of their ravaged homelands, and in the streets of Tunisia, Egypt and Morocco, fighting counterrevolutions and repressive, pro-“Israel” dictatorships. What the people of Africa, Black and Arab, Christian and Muslim, and everything in between, must know, is that the Zionist entity, inspired by a primordial Jewish supremacist ideology, has no interest in your land except to exploit it, and exploit you. Zionism is a cancer that infests, infects and destroys everything in its path. But like any other cancer, it can be counteracted and cut out, so it never returns.

O’ Africa! Cut out the Zionist cancer from your midst. Cut it out like a knife to flesh and vow never to mix with it again. It is what Sankara would have wanted. It is what Qadhdhafi would have wanted. It is what Mehdi Ben Barka would have wanted. It is the right thing to do; the just thing, for all of the martyrs of the Transatlantic Slave Trade. For Rwanda. For the Congo. For Burkina Faso. For Somalia. For Zimbabwe. For Uganda. For anyone and everyone who has suffered at the hands of the usurping Jewish entity; to all oppressed people from Africa to what lies beyond its beautiful and ancient borders, heed the call: cut out the Zionist infestation before it is too late. Cut it out before you wake up one morning to the cruel jackboot of Jewish cultural imperialism stepping on your soul, with no Fela Kuti to remind you of the “Zombie” that now personifies your very existence.

~ The End ~

Sources:

(1) Judaism Discovered: A Study Of The Anti-Biblical Religion Of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition And Deceit; Chapter – The Rabbinic Texts: The Most Virulent Source Of Anti-Black Racism In The West, Pages 505-506 by Professor Michael A. Hoffman II, Independent History and Research

(2) Judaism Discovered: A Study Of The Anti-Biblical Religion Of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition And Deceit; Chapter – Maimonides: Premier Anti-Black Racist, Page 500 by Professor Michael A. Hoffman II, Independent History and Research

(3) Judaism Discovered: A Study Of The Anti-Biblical Religion Of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition And Deceit; Chapter – The Rabbinic Texts: The Most Virulent Source Of Anti-Black Racism In The West, Pages 510-513 by Professor Michael A. Hoffman II, Independent History and Research

(4) Why Do So Many Jews Hate Black People? by Adam Bilzerian, The Bilzerian Report

(5) Rothschild And Freshfield Founders Linked To Slavery by Carola Hoyos, The Financial Times

(6) The House Of Rothschild: Money’s Prophets 1798-1848; Chapter Two: The Elector’s Treasure – The Origins Of A Myth, Mayer Amschel’s Legacy, Page 74 by Niall Ferguson, Penguin (Non-Classics)

(7) The New Babylon: Those Who Reign Supreme – A Panoramic Overview Of The Historical, Religious And Economic Origins Of The New World Order; Chapter Five – The Reign Of The House Of Rothschild: The Framework For A Global Jewish Imperium, Pages 119-124 by Michael Collins Piper, American Free Press

(8) Judaism Discovered: A Study Of The Anti-Biblical Religion Of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition And Deceit; Chapter – The Inferiority Of Gentiles, Page 359 by Professor Michael A. Hoffman II, Independent History and Research

(9) The House of Rothschild Volume 2: The World’s Banker 1849-1999; Chapter Eleven: The Risks And Returns Of Empire (1885-1902); Section – Rhodes And The Rothschilds, Pages 356-358 by Niall Ferguson, Penguin (Non-Classics)

(10) In Face Of Desperate African Poverty, Ruth Feigenbaum Provides A Beacon Of Hope by Suzanne Belling, Jewish Telegraph Agency

(11) Ways To Give: Gifts In Kind Donating Goods: Corporate Donors: What Our Donors Say by World Jewish Relief

(12) About Us: About Our Partners by World Jewish Relief

(13) Ruth Feigenbaum – Bulawayo’s Unsung Heroine 2006 by African Jewish Congress

(14) Mission Statement by African Jewish Congress

(15) Violence Reduces Zimbabwe Jewish Community by Steve Lipman, The Jewish Week

(16) Ahad Ha-Am: Leader Of Cultural Zionism, Early Zionist Philosopher by Rabbi Louis Jacobs, My Jewish Learning

(17) The Tribal Nexus: Zionists And “Anti-Zionists” Unite To Ensure The Survival Of “Israel” by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(18) Zimbabwe: We Will Supply Iran With Uranium For Its Nuclear Program by Haaretz

(19) Who’s To Blame For Zimbabwe’s Tragedy? by Ghali Hassan, Counter Currents

(20) Zimbabwe: Jewish Groups Lash Out At Mugabe by All Africa

(21) George Soros To Give $100 Million To Human Rights Watch by Human Rights Watch

(22) Blood Stones, Or Just A Rough Cut? by Shay Fogelman, Haaretz

(23) Israel’s Blood Diamonds by Seán Clinton, The Electronic Intifada

(24) Israeli Pilot Pleads Not Guilty To Diamond Possession by Zimbabwe Papers’ The Herald

(25) Israel’s Global Role: Weapons For Repression; Section – On The African Continent, Page 26 by Professor Israel Shahak, The Association of Arab-American University Graduates

(26) Zimbabwe: Who’s Behind Mugabe’s Ill-Health Reports? by Dumisani Muleya, All Africa

(27) ‘Save Darfur’ Funds Israeli Settlements by Rehmat’s World

(28) KONY 2012: Youth Movement Promotes US Military Presence In Central Africa by Nile Bowie, Empire Strikes Black

(29) New Video Shows Kony 2012 Creator Jason Russell’s Naked Meltdown Close-Up (VIDEO) by Aliyah Shahid and Philip Caulfield, The New York Daily News

(30) Wikileaks: Kony 2012 Creators Spied For Uganda by Russia Today

(31) Cross Cutting Programs: Transition Initiatives: Country Programs: Uganda: USAID/OTI Uganda Quarterly Report, January – March 2009 by USAID

(32) USAID Goes To School: Instruction Or Intelligence? by Faten Elhajj, Al-Akhbar English

(33) Conflict, Gender And Human Rights: Lessons Learned From The Field by Donald K. Steinberg, The Joan B. Kroc Institute For Peace and Justice

(34) Rwanda: The Shame Of Donald Steinberg by Iain Dale, Iain Dale’s Diary

(35) What Are The Former Mossad Chief’s Business Ties To Uganda? by Barak Ravid, Haaretz

(36) Israeli-Ugandan Relations In The Time Of Idi Admin by Dr. Ayre Oded, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs

(37) British Document: Israel Initiated Entebbe Hijack by Ynet

(38) Barak Unfazed By Criticism From Tanzania by Gil Hoffman, The Jerusalem Post

(39) Engel Goes For The Gold – And The Copper And Nickel – In Tanzania by Michael Rochvarger, Haaretz

(40) Israel’s Relations With The Third World (1948-2008) by Benyamin Neuberger, The S. Daniel Abraham Center for International and Regional Studies

(41) Israeli Officer Killed In Cameroon by Press TV

(42) Open Secrets: Israeli Nuclear And Foreign Policies; Chapter 5: Israeli Foreign Policy After The Oslo Accord, 1 November 1993, Page 70 by Professor Israel Shahak, Pluto Press

(43) America’s Conquest Of Africa: The Roles Of France And Israel; Introduction By Cynthia McKinney by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya and Julien Teil, Global Research

(44) Targeting Of Christian Syrians And Black Libyans: The “Clash Of Civilizations” Is On The March by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, Voltaire Net

(45) Brothers In Arms – Israel’s Secret Pact With Pretoria by Chris McGreal, The Guardian

(46) ‘Dogs Of War’ Ban Will Rob British Army Of Vital Frontline Soldiers by Fred Bridgland and Michael Evans, The Times (UK)

(47) PSYWAR: The Fake Fall Of Tripoli And The Zionist Dragon’s Butchery Across Palestine II by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(48) Israelis Widening Role In Ethiopian by Jane Perlez, The New York Times

(49) Ethiopian Army To Get Bluebird UAVs by Arie Egozi, Flight Global

(50) Israel’s Secret Wars: A History Of Israel’s Intelligence Services; Chapter 10: Interregnum With Peace: 1974-80, Section – Rescue At Entebbe, Pages 339-342, by Ian Black and Benny Morris, Grove Press

(51) Israel Targets East Africa With Kenya Security Pact by Brian Dabbs, World Politics Review

(52) Unpacking The Israel-Kenya Deal To Help Wage War On Somalia by Alex Kane, Mondoweiss

(53) Israeli Terror Drones Kill 17 In Somalia by Press TV

(54) U.S. Court Indicts Israeli Suspected Of Arms Trade With Somalia by Yossi Melman and Barak Ravid, Haaretz

(55) Syria Under Fire: Zionist Destabilization Hits Critical Mass by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(56) The Case Of Uri Avnery II: Hasbara, Supremacism And The Future Of Solidarity by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(57) Syria: Zionist Mobilization Kicks Into High Gear by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(58) Israel’s Global Role: Weapons For Repression; Section – On The African Continent, Page 22 by Professor Israel Shahak, The Association of Arab-American University Graduates

(59) Nigeria: ‘Christmas Day Bombings Were Designed To Cause Religious Wars’ – Muslim Group by Mohammad Shosanya, All Africa

(60) Nigeria: The Spreading Northern Insurgency by The Economist

(61) Boko Haram: MOSSAD, CIA To Probe Nigerian Security Agencies by Sam Popoola, The Moment (Nigeria)

(62) Madagascar Convicts, Expels Israeli Over Mercenary Plot by Ynet

(63) Israel’s Global Role: Weapons For Repression; Section – On The African Continent, Pages 23-24 by Professor Israel Shahak, The Association of Arab-American University Graduates

(64) Red Mafiya: How The Russian Mob Has Invaded America; Chapter 3: Brighton Beach Goodfellas, Pages 57-59 by Robert I. Friedman, Little, Brown and Company

(65) Gertler’s Bling Bang Torah Gang: Israel And The Ongoing Holocaust In Congo (Part 1) by Keith Harmon Snow, Dissident Voice

(66) Israel Sends Aid To Flood-Stricken Burkina Faso by The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs

(67) Members Of The Roncalli Committee: Honorary Members by The International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation

(68) About Us: Board Of Directors by The International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation

(69) Baruch Tenembaum: Biography by The International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation

(70) Former French FM: Israel Controls French Intelligence, Lobby Pressures US President by Ahlul Bayt News Agency

(71) Burkina Faso Salutes “Africa’s Che” Thomas Sankara by Mathieu Bonkoungou, Reuters

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

The Zionist Cuckoos in Christianity’s Nest

by Stuart Littlewood
Saturday, March 31st, 2012

If you are as puzzled as I am how a true Christian could possibly be taken in by Zionism, a short paper on the phenomenon is available from Sadaka http://www.sadaka.ie/Articles/Papers/PAPER-Christian_Zionism.pdf.

“The destiny of the Jewish people is to return to the land of Israel and reclaim their inheritance promised to Abraham and his descendants forever. This inheritance extends from the River of Egypt to the Euphrates. Within their land, Jerusalem is recognised to be their exclusive, undivided and eternal capital, and therefore it cannot be shared or divided.
At the heart of Jerusalem will be the rebuilt Jewish temple, to which all the nations will come to worship God. Just prior to the return of Jesus, there will be seven years of calamities and war known as the tribulation, which will culminate in a great battle called Armageddon, during which the godless forces opposed to both God and Israel will be defeated.
Jesus will then return as the Jewish Messiah and king to reign in Jerusalem for a thousand years, and the Jewish people will enjoy a privileged status and role in the world.”
The scary US-based Unity Coalition for Israel brings together more than 200 partners claiming to represent more than 40 million Americans in the largest network of Pro-Israel groups in the world. Their Mission is “to focus the efforts of secular and religious organizations and individuals for whom the existence of the State of Israel is central and essential to the future of the free world. We educate these organizations and individuals on security issues and radical ideologies, including global Islamic terrorism… UCI reaches millions of people through more than 200 Christian & Jewish organizations, including churches, synagogues, prayer networks, think tanks and thousands of individuals.

Christians owe debt of eternal gratitude to Jews”

Pastor John Hagee is founder and chairman of Christians United for Israel, which claims to be the largest pro-Israel organization in America, with over 850,000 members. It holds at least 40 pro-Israel events a month in towns and cities across this country. “We’re building support for Israel from coast to coast!” is the sort of proclamation that reveals the real agenda.
What does Hagee’s CUfI believe in?

  • We believe in the absolute authority of the [sacred] scripture to govern the affairs of men.
  • We believe in the promise of Genesis 12:3 regarding the Jewish people and the nation of Israel. We believe that this is an eternal covenant between God and the seed of Abraham to which God is faithful. Genesis 12:3 “And I will bless them that bless thee and curse him that curseth thee; and in thee shall all nations of the earth be blessed.” Point: God has promised to bless the man or nation that blesses the Chosen People. History has proven beyond reasonable doubt that the nations that have blessed the Jewish people have had the blessing of God; the nations that have cursed the Jewish people have experienced the curse of God.
  • We support Israel because all other nations were created by an act of men, but Israel was created by an act of God! The Royal Land Grant that was given to Abraham and his seed through Isaac and Jacob with an everlasting and unconditional covenant.
  • St. Paul recorded in Romans 15:27 “For if the Gentiles have shared in their (the Jews) spiritual things, they are indebted to minister to them also in material things.”
  • Christians owe a debt of eternal gratitude to the Jewish people for their contributions that gave birth to the Christian faith… the Jewish people have given to Christianity:

a) The Sacred Scripture
b) The Prophets
c) The Patriarchs
d) Mary, Joseph, and Jesus Christ of Nazareth
e) The Twelve Disciples
f) The Apostles
It is not possible to say, “I am a Christian” and not love the Jewish people.

Hagee pretends the relationship between Christians and Jews in biblical times still applies today. He uses ‘mushroom management’ methods – keep ‘em in the dark and keep shoveling horse manure at ‘em. If his Cornerstone church followers bothered to take an independent trip to the West Bank and Gaza – and I do mean independent, not an Israeli bus tour with guides trained by the Tel Aviv propaganda department (or by Hagee) – they’d quickly discover the unpalatable truth. The glitzy Hagee empire, and others like it, would then crumble.

An effective riposte to the biblical distortions used to support Israel’s lust for supremacy is The Jerusalem Declaration on Christian Zionism, a statement by the Latin Patriarch and Local Heads of Churches in Jerusalem issued in 2006 http://imeu.net/news/article003122.shtml. They are on the ground, in the front line, in the Holy Land. They know the score. They put the genuine Christian case. And it is summed up in the first sentence:

“We categorically reject Christian Zionist doctrines as a false teaching that corrupts the biblical message of love, justice and reconciliation.
We further reject the contemporary alliance of Christian Zionist leaders and organizations with elements in the governments of Israel and the United States that are presently imposing their unilateral pre-emptive borders and domination over Palestine. This inevitably leads to unending cycles of violence that undermine the security of all peoples of the Middle East and the rest of world.
We reject the teachings of Christian Zionism that facilitate and support these policies as they advance racial exclusivity and perpetual war rather than the gospel of universal love, redemption and reconciliation taught by Jesus Christ. Rather than condemn the world to the doom of Armageddon we call upon everyone to liberate themselves from ideologies of militarism and occupation. Instead, let them pursue the healing of the nations!”

The Declaration, explains Sadaka, asserts that “Christian Zionists have aggressively imposed an aberrant expression of the Christian faith and an erroneous interpretation of the Bible, which is subservient to the political agenda of the modern State of Israel… Christian Zionism thrives on a literal and futurist hermeneutic in which Old Testament promises made to the ancient Jewish people are transferred to the contemporary State of Israel in anticipation of a final future fulfillment.” For the posh churchy word ‘hermeneutic’, read ‘interpreting the Scriptures’.

Corrupting the Biblical Message

Not only does Zionism cloak itself in the Jewish faith, it hides its ugly face behind Christianity’s skirts. And, believe it or not, there is even a movement calling itself the World Muslim Zionist Organization.
In Christianity’s case the rot set in way back in1909 when the Scofield study bible was published and became the standard religious text in the United States.

It’s a propaganda classic. And the indoctrination has lasted 100 years.

Cyrus Scofield, a convicted criminal and described by one American newspaper as “a shyster”, was commissioned to re-write the King James bible by inserting Zionist-friendly notes. The idea was to change the Christian view of Zionism by creating and promoting a pro-Zionist sub-culture within Christianity. The Oxford University Press appointed Scofield as editor, and the Scofield Reference Bible was born

It introduced a new worship icon, the modern State of Israel, which did not exist until 1948 but was already being ‘prepped’ on the drawing board of the World Zionist movement.

American journalist Grace Halsell explained the re-hashed Biblical message:
“Simply stated it is this: Every act taken by Israel is orchestrated by God, and should be condoned, supported, and even praised by the rest of us. Never mind what Israel does, say the Christian Zionists. God wants this to happen…

Scofield said that Christ cannot return to earth until certain events occur: The Jews must return to Palestine, gain control of Jerusalem and rebuild a temple, and then we all must engage in the final, great battle called Armageddon. Estimates vary, but most students of Armageddon theology agree that as a result of these relatively recent interpretations of Biblical scripture, 10 to 40 million Americans believe Palestine is God’s chosen land for the Jews.”

This belief that Old Testament promises made to the ancient Jewish tribes are transferable to the largely unrelated people that make up the modern state of Israel is what underpins their hope for the final battle they call Armageddon, in which Israel’s enemies (and God’s, of course) will be defeated. After that Jesus will return as the Jewish Messiah and King to reign in Jerusalem for a thousand years, and the Jewish people will enjoy privileged status in the world.

That is the Zionist dream of world domination in a nutshell. What’s in it for non-Jews? Blessed if I know. Yet armies of non-Jewish politicians have become eager stooges.
My reading of history is that the Jews were expelled from Palestine by the Roman occupation in 70AD, when the second temple in Jerusalem was destroyed. They were expelled again in 135AD.
Nowadays return is regarded as an inalienable right. But it must be exercised as soon as the reason for expulsion (e.g. foreign occupation) ceases. In the Jews’ case an opportunity would have occurred in the 4th century AD as the Roman Empire collapsed. But they didn’t take it. They can hardly expect to change their mind 16 centuries later. Their right expired a very long time ago.

By comparison the Palestinians’ right of return after being ethnically cleansed in 1948 (and ever since) is valid because the enemy occupation has not yet ended and the UN has endorsed their right.
Nevertheless Zionists claim Jerusalem is theirs by heavenly decree. But this holiest of cities was already 2000 years old when King David captured it.

Historians say that Jerusalem, in its ‘City of David’ form, lasted only 73 years. In 928BC the kingdom divided into Israel and Judah, and in 597BC the Babylonians conquered the city and destroyed Solomon’s temple. The Jews recaptured it in 164BC but finally lost it to the Roman Empire in 63BC. Before the present-day illegal occupation the Jews controlled Jerusalem for some 500 years, whereas it was subsequently ruled by Muslims for 1,277 years. Before the Jews it belonged to the Canaanites. And for nearly 90 years it was also a Christian kingdom. A lot of competing claims, then, which is probably why the UN declared in 1947 that it should be independently administered as an international city.

In 1187 Saladin restored Jerusalem to Islam while allowing Jews and Christians to remain. Today Jewish religious groups want control of the city for their spiritual centre and for a third temple to be built in accordance with ancient prophecies. The plan to make the Israeli occupation permanent threatens not only the Muslim but also the Christian holy places. Political and religious tensions are thus kept at boiling point. It is no wonder that the Iranian president quoted the late Ayatollah Khomeini as saying the unfriendly regime occupying Jerusalem “must vanish from the page of time”. It is no surprise either that he was immediately misquoted by Zionist propagandists as wanting to wipe Israel off the map.

The question is, are we seriously to believe that an all-powerful Supernatural Being has chosen and elevated one group of humans to a position of supremacy above all others, and has approved the use of any mean, including murder, brutal eviction and even war, to achieve their selfish goal, and now mobilizes millions of lesser mortals from around the globe, like those who regard themselves as upstanding Christians, to serve as tools and sing the praises of this ‘Grand Design’?

I’m with the Churches of Jerusalem on this. It’s a gross corruption of the biblical message.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

What is the Truth that You Fear?

Dear Jewish People,
Well spring’s just about here! What a great day it is—unless of course you’re in Gaza! There I expect people are too busy caring for the injured and mourning the dead to notice much about the weather. Which kind of brings me to what I wanted to talk to you about today, Jewish people. Why, O why, can’t you do something nice for the Palestinians rather than bombin’ and killin’em all the time? Instead of raining death down out of the sky, why don’t you try raining kindness instead?
Give some thought to this. Try buildin’ the Palestinians some schools or hospitals, or you could maybe issue a few building permits so they could build homes or open businesses. You might even go so far as to provide educational opportunities for low-income Palestinian youths so they could attend universities, or maybe fix it so’s Palestinian farmers could work their fields without getting shot at or having to worry about hooligan settlers destroying their crops. Or here’s an idea—how about a public transit system linking Gaza and the West Bank, where Palestinians living in one area could visit their families in the other? What I’m getting at here is, after stealing their land and drivin’em from their homes, you’d think your tribal cousins in Israel might want to actually do something to help the Palestinians for a change. I mean, that’s only natural. When you’ve caused harm to someone, the natural, instinctive human response is to want to negate it in some way if possible, to reply with compassion, you know? To sort of help make amends. That’s the urge most normal people would have. But then again, maybe the leaders of that state of yours in the Middle East aren’t normal.
At any rate, instead of schools, hospitals and freedom to raise their families and pursue their livelihoods, all Palestinians ever seem to get from Israelis are bombs, bullets, and missiles. In other words, what’s guaranteed in the US Constitution—life liberty and pursuit of happiness—is precisely what you’re denying to the Palestinians. All of which is starting to make some of us goyim here in America wonder whether there might not be something seriously, seriously amiss with this “Jewish state” of yours in the Middle East. But of course—any of us ever raise any of these issues, we get called “anti-Semites.” Which is another thing I wanted to bring up with you today, Jewish people, is this word “anti-Semitism”—does anybody even know what it means anymore? If I’m not a-liking to see people killed from airplanes, or see children shot on their way to school, or if I think it’s kinda senseless to bulldoze homes that folks need to live in, does that make me an “anti-Semite”? And if it does, then when I get called one, shouldn’t I actually regard it as a compliment rather than an insult? And if so, wouldn’t I be justified in standing shoulder to shoulder with all the other “anti-Semites” in the world who’ve opposed these things? Whaddaya think about that, Jewish people?
Here’s something someone said recently that kind of sums it all up in a nutshell: “An ‘anti-Semite’ used to be someone who hates Jews; now it’s someone who Jews hate.” Lord! That’s a bit o’ truth-tellin’ there! That’s Babe Ruth knockin’ one outta the ballpark!!! Now here’s a question for ya: what is it that seems to arouse Jewish hatred more than anything else? Got any ideas? Why…the simple act of standing up and speaking the truth. Now I know, Jewish people, you’ll deny that. You’ll say, ‘Why who could possibly object to someone simply telling the truth about something or someone?’ But consider that Gillard Atzmon feller we keep hearing so much about these days. All he did is write a book stating a few simple, basic truths, and all of a sudden we get Jewish folk—practically all over the world, seems like—stomping, screaming, callin’ him an anti-Semite and so on and so forth. And all just for writin’ a book!!!!!!
All of which brings me to one final point—and this is what I really wanted to discuss with you today: it seems like there is something—something embedded deep within the Jewish psyche—that hates, loathes, and fears the truth. So my question for you is: what is that “something” in you that cowers from the truth…and what pray tell exactly is the truth that it fears? I doubt there’s a lot of you who even know the answer to that. I mean, it’s kinda like what them psychologist fellers (and ladies) refer to as “cognitive dissonance.” Ya know? But hey—I want you to be aware of something, Jewish people. I’m here for you! You can count on me! And to try and help you sort through it all, I’ve devised the following:
Top 20 Contenders for the ‘Most
Uncomfortable Truths’ awards!
Okay, here we go!
1. Not all Jewish people are lovable, kind and adorable.
2. A lot of the criminals on Wall St. are Jews.
3. The notion that “Gentiles are donkeys” is not backed up by scientific fact.
4. On the other hand, the sounds “Oyyy”—made by Jews—and “Oinnnk”—made by pigs—possess certain observable, quantifiable phonetic similarities.
5. But don’t get offended!!!!—because if you click here you can read how pigs are among the most intelligent creatures in the animal kingdom!
6. The saying that “Jews own the media” is based on realistic evaluation and cannot be dismissed as “anti-Semitic canard.”
7. The same media—controlled in large part by Jews—are inclined to fib a bit now and then.
8. The Jews of yesteryear who wrote the Old Testament may not have been any more truthful than the Jews of today who own the media.
9. No archaeological evidence has been found to suggest that the Temple of Solomon ever existed.
10. Little evidence exists to show that the 10th century BC kingdom of David was anywhere near what it’s cracked up to be in the Bible.
11. Your messiah already came and you killed him.
12. Most Jews are Khazars and not really Jews.
13. Jewish humor is not really all that funny.
14. Jewish “cuisine” is inferior to Chinese food.
15. Egg rolls are far tastier than “Haman’s ears.”
16. The reason so many Jews have stampeded up to claim Nobel prizes in the land of the midnight sun might be because Jews are disproportionately overrepresented on the Nobel Committee (which might explain a lot of other weird things about who gets Nobel prizes and who doesn’t).
17. The “facts” surrounding the Holocaust might bear reexamining.
18. A Jewish fingernail is not worth the lives of one million Palestinian children.
19. Black hats and sidecurls look kind of dorky.
20. The leaders of Israel make hissing snakes look benevolent.
Now here’s your assignment. Look over the above list. Consider each item carefully. And as you do, try and figure out which one would be the hardest for you to have to come to terms with were you suddenly to find yourself forced to do so. It’s an exercise that well might tell ya a lot about what your inner hang-ups are. And I’m providin’ it to you free of charge and hopin’ you can get some good out of it!
Well that’s about it for today, Jewish people! We’ll talk at’cha again real soon!
Best wishes,
Buddy the Goy

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
 The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Obama, AIPAC And The Rest of US

By Gilad Atzmon

AIPAC Yesterday at AIPAC annual conference, the American president had to go out of his way to appease his Jewish crowd. He used every trick in the book, he even peppered his talk with some Yiddish sporadic words and he did it all just to justify his decision not to launch a World War as yet.

One should ask, how come a lobby of a small state that practices the most appalling racist expansionist politics and practices has managed to gain so much political power in the USA.

As it happens, more and more academics and political commentators indeed ask themselves the exact question – they wonder what is it in American culture and political system that allowed it to happen? I am also interested in a very similar quest. I actually try to identify the different elements within Jewish culture and identity politics that have led to the rise of AIAPC into the dominant force within American politics and foreign policy.

In my latest book, The Wandering Who, a book that both Zionist and Jewish Anti Zionist Zionists (JAZZ) are desperate to stop, I explore those themes. I for instance, elaborate on the significant role of the Book of Esther’, in shaping Jewish Lobbing in the West and beyond. The Book of Ester is an Old Testament text that preaches lobby culture and tribal infiltration into foreign administrations.

I also explore the Exilic nature of Judaism. I maintain that Judaism, as we know it, was founded in Babylon in conditions that, from Jewish perspectives, were very similar to 19th century Europe and the birth moment of Zionism. In both cases it was the fear of assimilation that led towards the invention of an isolationist and separatist cult.

Seemingly the exilic nature of Judaism transcended itself into Jewish secular and nationalist politics- rather than being concerned with the ‘here and now’, the Diaspora Zionist Jew explores his or her aspiration towards a different place and different time i.e. Zion. Unlike other migrant lobbies in the West that are engaged in issues to do with the interests of their respective migrant communities (in terms of social rights, religious freedom, education and so on), the Jewish Lobby is actually solely concerned with the interest of a remote state and a remote community. This fact alone, explains the uniqueness of AIPAC. It also means that it is unlikely that any other political lobby would ever compete successfully with AIPAC except another Jewish Lobby.

Yet one may wonder whether AIPAC’s hegemony over American foreign policy is ‘good for the Jews’. In fact, more than a few commentators including myself are convinced that that it is actually a total disaster. It doesn’t take a genius to notice that the domination of Jewish elite in the USA is similar to the condition of German Jewish elite in late 1920’s Weimar Republic. In fact Jewish history is saturated with similar occurrences in which Jewish elite’s overwhelming influence led to the birth of rapid growing of anti – Jewish sentiment.

Israeli historian Shlomo Sand points out that in between the 1st and early 19th century Jews didn’t engage in writing history. Not a single Jewish historical text saw daylight in that period. According to Sand, the Rabbinical Jew didn’t need history text. The Bible provided a sufficient explanation. The meaning of it is clear, there is an element of Jewish cultural denial to historical thinking. Such an interpretation may help us to grasp the surprising fact that Jewish communities in the West are not at all alarmed by the growing influence of the Jewish lobbies in West and AIPAC or CFI in particular.
In fact, the complete opposite is correct. Jewish communities are often in the press boasting of their Lobbying victories. Jewish communities also invest a lot of energy silencing any attempt to point at the growing danger entangled with the emergence of Jewish power. This is far from being new. Jewish history is saturated with attempts to shoot the messengers and whistle blowers: Jesus found himself nailed to the wood, Spinoza was excommunicated, Bernard Lazare was largely ignored, Otto Weininger was dismissed, Mordechai Vanunu is locked behind bars again and as my followers know, I am also chased by the like of Alan Dershowitz, and the Jewish Anti Zionist Zionists (JAZZ).

Like many other commentators on Middle East current affairs, I also don’t have any doubt that we are facing a volatile situation. Considering its influence and its open advocacy to attack on Iran, AIPAC is a grave threat to world peace. In the open it pushes for another war that can easily escalate into a nuclear global conflict. AIPAC clearly endangers American interests and American people but it is also very dangerous for Jewish communities all over the world.

If America loves itself and cares for its future, it must immediately find within itself the means to dismantle the power of this lobby. America owes it to its people, to world peace but also to its Jews who largely have nothing to do with this appalling warmongering genocidal campaign.

The_Wandering_Who
Gilad Atzmon’s New Book: The Wandering Who? A Study Of Jewish Identity Politics Amazon.com or Amazon.co.uk.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!